BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

63 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 12clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,087Delhi2,342Kolkata699Jaipur605Chennai515Ahmedabad490Surat386Bangalore343Pune316Chandigarh251Hyderabad225Indore194Raipur146Karnataka126Rajkot121Amritsar107Nagpur101Visakhapatnam84Lucknow67Cuttack64Cochin63Guwahati60Calcutta46Jodhpur42Agra42Allahabad35Patna29Ranchi24Telangana17Dehradun11Jabalpur7Varanasi7SC6Panaji5Orissa3Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 250114Section 80I12Section 801B6Addition to Income6Bogus Purchases3Disallowance3Section 1322Section 153A2Section 143(2)2

SRI.C.SHAJI,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(1), TRIVNDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 505/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Dr.Pradeep K.P., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR

bogus 6 Sri.C.Shaji. purchases. Accordingly, this ground raised by the assessee is dismissed. 9. The next issue for our consideration reads as follow:- “The disallowance of Rs.2,81,63,141/- as cash purchase in excess of Rs.20,000/- citing the provisions of Section 40A(3) is highly unreasonable and against law. As per Section

SRI.NAVAS M.MEERAN,ADIMALY vs. THE DCIT, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 326/COCH/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin

Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4

Section 692
Deduction2
01 Mar 2019
AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69Section 801BSection 80I

bogus purchases made by the assessee out of undisclosed sources. 7. The facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer made addition u/s. 69 of the Act of the differentials between the amounts being expenses debited in the I.T.A. Nos.325&326/Coch/2017 books of accounts and the amounts substantively supported by invoices, which amounts relate to the transactions carried

SRI.NAVA M.MEERAN,ADIMALY vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 325/COCH/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69Section 801BSection 80I

bogus purchases made by the assessee out of undisclosed sources. 7. The facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer made addition u/s. 69 of the Act of the differentials between the amounts being expenses debited in the I.T.A. Nos.325&326/Coch/2017 books of accounts and the amounts substantively supported by invoices, which amounts relate to the transactions carried

M/S.PRINCE ROLLER FLOUR MILLS P. LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the

ITA 36/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

bogus. Please explain in detail. 37 I.T.A. Nos. 36 to 41/Coch/2019 & ITA Nos. 21 to 26/Coch/2019 (A) The Sales and Purchase of wheat with Sri. P. K. Kunjumoideen is recorded in the books of accounts and the supporting sales bills and purchased invoice are maintained. But in reality there is no sales made to Sri. P. K Kunjumoideen. Instead

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.PRINCE ROLLER FLOUR MILLS P. LTD, PALAKKAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the

ITA 21/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

bogus. Please explain in detail. 37 I.T.A. Nos. 36 to 41/Coch/2019 & ITA Nos. 21 to 26/Coch/2019 (A) The Sales and Purchase of wheat with Sri. P. K. Kunjumoideen is recorded in the books of accounts and the supporting sales bills and purchased invoice are maintained. But in reality there is no sales made to Sri. P. K Kunjumoideen. Instead

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 502/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 436/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI PARTNER, ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 836/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI PARTNER, ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 835/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI PARTNER, ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 837/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI, PARTNER(ABC SALAES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 523/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue