BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 12clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,788Delhi1,081Jaipur316Kolkata279Ahmedabad259Chennai248Bangalore181Chandigarh155Surat150Hyderabad128Indore112Rajkot106Raipur102Pune99Amritsar73Visakhapatnam61Cochin58Nagpur52Guwahati51Lucknow48Jodhpur36Allahabad33Agra29Patna26Cuttack20Ranchi16Dehradun10Varanasi7Jabalpur6Panaji3

Key Topics

Section 250114

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,COCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 438/COCH/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARAGOD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 503/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 504/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 506/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 436/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC BUILDWAERS INDIA (P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 456/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 458/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 502/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL IRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 437/COCH/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

12 has denied upholding the addition on account of difference in the value of the closing stock without having any difference in the quantity of the stock. The relevant extract of the order is reproduced as under: 6. The Tribunal in the impugned order has concurred with the findings recorded by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has observed that the revenue