61 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 10(34)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail
34,87,077 was treated as an unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Act. 6. The learned CIT(A), vide impugned order, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee and upheld the addition made by the AO. Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us. 7. We have considered the submissions of both sides and perused the material