BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

118 results for “TDS”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai685Delhi623Chennai265Kolkata253Jaipur185Hyderabad177Bangalore169Cochin118Ahmedabad117Chandigarh65Indore60Pune50Surat40Rajkot39Guwahati33Cuttack33Nagpur32Raipur24Lucknow22Allahabad21Karnataka20Agra20Amritsar19Jodhpur18Visakhapatnam12Patna11Dehradun9Ranchi7Varanasi7Jabalpur4Telangana4Punjab & Haryana2Gauhati1Calcutta1Panaji1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 153C101Section 25090Addition to Income46Section 15331Section 13223Search & Seizure19Undisclosed Income19Section 4010Limitation/Time-bar10Section 69

THEACIT, CIR-1(1),EKM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 453/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.MATHAI XAVIER, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 451/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 118 · Page 1 of 6

8
Section 2(24)(vi)8
Section 488
ITAT Cochin
17 Jan 2019
AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

THE ITO, WARD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.MARTIN JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 354/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

THE ACIT, CIR-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.JOSE MATHEW, M/S.E.V.MTHAI & SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 450/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.TOMY MATHEW PARTNER OF MATHAI SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 419/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.E.J.SONY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 355/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.PAUL, EDAKATTUKUDIYIL, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 449/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

SRI.ESSA ISMAIL SAIT,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT,CIR-2(1),, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 605/COCH/2005[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

TDS-Income tax 24000.00 J.M.H.E.S. 477483.17 Dharmasthapanam H.E.A.M.S. 239932.00 Dharmasthapanam Investments: Federal Bank Share 5000.00 Dhanalakshmi Bank Share 127500.00 Loss in Kanmani A/c. Op. Balance 3077206.01 Add: For the year 755934.52 3833140.53 30130944.19 30130944.19 I.T.A. Nos.605/Coch/2005 & others The particulars of the cash at Bank show that the assessee was having a total amount of Rs.2

MUAHAMMED JABIR, PARTNER ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 519/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABC BUILDWARE INDIA (P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 389/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

MUAHAMMED JABIR,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 521/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARGOD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 536/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI(PARTNER ABC SALES CORPORATION).,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 529/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABC SALES CORPOATION,PAYYANNUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 534/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

MUAHAMMED JABIR(PARTNER , ABC SALES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 520/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABDUL GAFOOR MUHAMMED POTTICHI,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 518/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABDUL GAFOOR MUHAMMED POTTICHI,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 516/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 535/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

KEERAN MUHAMMED BASHEER,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 508/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA (P) LIMITED,PARIYARAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 533/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming to the technical issues raised