BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

60 results for “TDS”+ Section 94(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,083Delhi1,063Bangalore462Chennai437Kolkata235Hyderabad203Indore181Ahmedabad152Karnataka129Raipur101Jaipur99Chandigarh65Cochin60Pune55Surat37Visakhapatnam36Lucknow32Rajkot26Jodhpur21Nagpur19Kerala17Cuttack12Patna12Guwahati10Telangana10Dehradun8Allahabad6Ranchi5SC4Calcutta3Agra2Jabalpur2Amritsar2Gauhati1Panaji1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 250115Section 2634Section 143(3)3Addition to Income3Section 37(1)2Section 372Exemption2Deduction2TDS2Disallowance

GEORGE KOCHUPARAMBIL, PROP. UNITED GRANITES & METALS,THODUPUZHA vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 190/COCH/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai, Juduicial Member & Ms. Padmavathy Sshri George Kochuparambil Kochuparambil House Dcit/Acit, Central Vazhithala P.O. Vs. Circle Thodupuzha Kochi Idukki 685583 Pan – Afjpk9650E Appellant Respondent Appellant By: Shri Mathew Joseph, Ca Respondent By: Shri M. Jarasekhar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.03.2023

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri M. Jarasekhar, CIT-DR
Section 135Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 37(1)

7. As per the Balance sheet as on 31/3/2017, assessee has given loan/advance amounting Rs.7,38,47,572/- including Land advance of Rs.1,91,10,000/-. Out of these loans/advances, except Rs.44,22,512/- (Royalty Advance, L&T Finance Ltd. (TDS), Reliance – TDS, Petromee Engineers, input tax credit, Standard electricals), others amounting Rs.6,94,25,060/- cannot be treated

Showing 1–20 of 60 · Page 1 of 3

2

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARAGOD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 504/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 506/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 436/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

ABC BUILDWAERS INDIA (P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 456/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 458/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 503/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 502/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,COCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 438/COCH/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

7. Thus, the Tribunal has recorded concurrent findings of fact to the effect that the revenue had failed to establish that there was in fact any difference in the quantity of stock and has thereafter merely applied the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, wherein in a similar set of facts it had been held that there was no justification