BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

309 results for “TDS”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,607Delhi1,530Bangalore665Chennai505Kolkata400Ahmedabad312Cochin309Hyderabad302Indore187Jaipur178Raipur160Chandigarh145Pune125Karnataka123Surat74Cuttack71Visakhapatnam62Nagpur56Lucknow45Rajkot39Guwahati32Ranchi19Dehradun18Amritsar18Allahabad18Kerala17Agra15Telangana13Jodhpur12SC11Varanasi10Patna9Panaji5Punjab & Haryana2Calcutta2Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Section 25074TDS31Addition to Income27Limitation/Time-bar26Section 80P18Section 244A10Section 109Section 408Section 2638Section 143(3)7Section 234E6Deduction5

ITO, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.SOUTHERN MINERAL INDUSTRIES,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 370/COCH/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri P. K. Bansal & Shri George George K.

Section 194CSection 194ISection 201

section 40(a)(ia) in respect of lease hire charges paid by the assessee during the assessment year 2006-07 amounting to Rs.67,90,900/-, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer by holding that the assessee was liable to deduct TDS

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

ITA 475/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santham Bose, CIT-DR
Section 144C(5)Section 190Section 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 92C(3)

TDS with the Government. 27. A proviso which is inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the provision workable, a proviso which supplies an obvious omission in the Section, is required to be read into the Section to give the Section a reasonable interpretation and requires to be treated as retrospective in operation so that a reasonable interpretation

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

ITA 134/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santham Bose, CIT-DR
Section 144C(5)Section 190Section 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 92C(3)

TDS with the Government. 27. A proviso which is inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the provision workable, a proviso which supplies an obvious omission in the Section, is required to be read into the Section to give the Section a reasonable interpretation and requires to be treated as retrospective in operation so that a reasonable interpretation

MR.THOMAS DANIEL,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 68/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.68/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2014-15

Section 194ASection 40Section 44A

90,917/- u/s 40(a)(ia) being payment of interest on borrowed funds from firms in which appellant is a partner without TDS u/s 194A. The Ld. AR submitted that Section

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 567/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 37Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

90,334. The Assessing Officer disallowed the same on the ground that the Appellant is not eligible to claim the same. During the appeal proceedings, the learned AR has argued that the Appellant is eligible for deduction under section 80P of the Act. The arguments of the learned AR are ITA Nos.566-567/Coch/2018 4 SA No.44-45/Coch/2018. M/s.Kerala State Co-op Agri

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 566/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 37Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

90,334. The Assessing Officer disallowed the same on the ground that the Appellant is not eligible to claim the same. During the appeal proceedings, the learned AR has argued that the Appellant is eligible for deduction under section 80P of the Act. The arguments of the learned AR are ITA Nos.566-567/Coch/2018 4 SA No.44-45/Coch/2018. M/s.Kerala State Co-op Agri

ADCIT, THRISSUR vs. THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD,, TRICHUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 635/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Aug 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.635 /Coch/2017 Assessment Year : 2007-08 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd., Income-Tax, Circle-1(1), St. Mary’S College Road, Thrissur. Thrissur-680020. [Pan: Aabct 0024D]

Section 140ASection 143(1)(a)Section 244ASection 244A(1)

90 in place of sections 214, 243 and 244, it was held that the assessee is entitled to interest u/s. 244A of the Act on the excess self-assessment tax paid u/s. 140A of the Act and observed as under: I.T.A. No.635/C/2017 “In sub-section (1) to section 244A where refund of any amount becomes due to the assessee

M/S AC CARGO MANAGEMENT P.LTD,,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 320/COCH/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri George George. K.] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 320/Coch/2013. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2007-2008. Vs. M/S. Ac Cargo Management The Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd, Ward 1(1) 1St Floor, Chacko Chambers, Kochi Civil Lines Road, Palarivattom, Kochi 682 025. [Pan Aaeca 2206K] (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" (ू"यथ" ू"यथ" ू"यथ"/Respondent) ू"यथ"

For Appellant: Shri. R. Krishnan, C.A
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 40

TDS and the assessee had failed to effect such deductions. According to him, lower authorities were justified in applying Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. :- 6 -: 7. We have considered the rival contentions and perused the orders of the authorities below. It would be apposite to have look at the MOU entered by the assessee for leasing the Containarized

MARIAMMA JOSEPH,KOTTAYAMN vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is decided on the aforesaid terms

ITA 672/COCH/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Mar 2024AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasmariamma Joseph Asst. Cit, Central Circle Hotel Floral Park Kottayam 686001 Gandhinagar Vs. Kottayam 686008 [Pan:Accpj9135F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 208Section 210Section 234Section 234BSection 234B(3)

TDS, Adv. Tax or self-assessment tax is deemed to be given.’ The same stood confirmed in first appeal; the ld. CIT(A) holding as: ‘In the present case, assessment order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153A was passed for the A.Y 2010-11 on 28.3.2013. The appellate order was passed on 16.2.2016. The order of the Assessing Officer merged with

M/S EDAVANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD NO 1,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(5) NON CORPORATE, KOCHI

ITA 1017/COCH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI SANJAY ARORA (Accountant Member), SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Anjana A, (Adv)For Respondent: Smt J. M Jamuna Devi, (Sr. AR)
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

90 to 92/Coch/2022 A.Ys. 2013-14 to AY. 2015-16 M/s. Edavannakkad Service Co-op. of Rs.58,860/- after claiming deduction of Rs.15,09,160/- u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. And the Assessing Officer had completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act by order dated 07.01.2016 by finalizing the total income at Rs.23

M/S EDAVANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD NO 1,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(5) NON CORPORATE, KOCHI

ITA 1015/COCH/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI SANJAY ARORA (Accountant Member), SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Anjana A, (Adv)For Respondent: Smt J. M Jamuna Devi, (Sr. AR)
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

90 to 92/Coch/2022 A.Ys. 2013-14 to AY. 2015-16 M/s. Edavannakkad Service Co-op. of Rs.58,860/- after claiming deduction of Rs.15,09,160/- u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. And the Assessing Officer had completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act by order dated 07.01.2016 by finalizing the total income at Rs.23

M/S EDAVANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD NO 1,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ITO WARD 2(5) NON CORPORATE, KOCHI

ITA 1016/COCH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SANJAY ARORA (Accountant Member), SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Ms. Anjana A, (Adv)For Respondent: Smt J. M Jamuna Devi, (Sr. AR)
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

90 to 92/Coch/2022 A.Ys. 2013-14 to AY. 2015-16 M/s. Edavannakkad Service Co-op. of Rs.58,860/- after claiming deduction of Rs.15,09,160/- u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. And the Assessing Officer had completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act by order dated 07.01.2016 by finalizing the total income at Rs.23

M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS(INDIA) P.LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 422/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.P.M.Veeramani, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40

90,000 under section 36(1 )(iii) is not correct. Moreover , the assessment for the earlier years were completed under section 143(3), of which two years was done by the same AO accepting the appellant's argument of commercial expediency and the disallowance under section 36(1 )(iii) was not made. It is submitted that the assessing officer should

M/S.VIJAYA HOSPITALITY AND RESORTS LTD,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ADCIT(TDS), COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 96/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Cochin24 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Thomas Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 271CSection 273Section 273B

section 271C(1)(b) (failure to remit the tax deducted at source), despite the fact that it may be a more serious default, than the failure to deduct the tax at source.” 9.4 In the instant case, the major part of the TDS relates to remuneration to the Directors credited to the unsecured loan account. However, the TDS was payable

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 99/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 101/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 102/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 100/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 103/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 919/COCH/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

90 on account of tax paid in a country outside India; (iv) any relief of tax allowed under section 90A on account of tax paid in a specified territory outside India referred to in that section; (v) any deduction, from the Indian income-tax payable, allowed under section 91, on account of tax paid in a country outside India

Showing 1–20 of 309 · Page 1 of 16

...