PALLATH NAFEESA,MALAPPURAM vs. ITO, TIRUR
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee allowed
ITA 118/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Pallath Nafeesa The Income Tax Officer Poolakkodan House Tirur Athirumada, Punnathala Vs. Tirur, Malappuram 676552 [Pan: Alipn9300R] (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Shaji Paulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 10(37)Section 145ASection 194ASection 197Section 28Section 34Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57
1,64,36,212/- and interest on the same for Rs.
79,11,298/- only. The amount of additional compensation as well as the amount of interest was claimed as exempted income under section 10(37) of the Act. The assessee contended that interest received was in accordance with section 28 of Land Acquisition Act of 1894which is part