BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

74 results for “TDS”+ Section 56clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,636Mumbai1,453Bangalore780Chennai534Kolkata298Hyderabad270Ahmedabad215Chandigarh169Indore160Jaipur147Karnataka136Pune122Cochin74Lucknow51Visakhapatnam50Raipur49Rajkot32Surat25Nagpur24Jodhpur18Agra17Cuttack17Guwahati17Ranchi17Patna15Amritsar14Dehradun13Telangana12Varanasi9SC7Jabalpur7Panaji6Kerala5Calcutta4Uttarakhand2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 250116Section 142(1)25Section 4011Deduction11Section 145(3)10Section 80P9TDS9Section 698Section 144C8Addition to Income

THE KAREEPPA PANCHAYATH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.D,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 732/COCH/2023[AY-2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Ms. Anoopa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 2Section 22Section 250Section 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

56 of the BR Act, 1949. In the result, the appeals filed by the appellant are allowed and the order(s) of the Kerala High Court and other authorities to the contrary are set aside. Consequently, we hold that the appellant is entitled to the benefit of deduction under Section 80P of the Act. The questions for consideration are answered

Showing 1–20 of 74 · Page 1 of 4

8
Section 1477
Disallowance7

VADAKKEVILA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 478/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms.Anoopa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. We thus accept the assessee’s above extracted third substantive grounds in very terms. 6. Learned CIT-DR next submits that the assessee had not derived its interest income from loans and advances in 16 ITA No.478/Coch/2023. Vadakkevila SCB Ltd. agricultural sector so as to be eligible for sec.80P deduction herein. Learned

PALLATH NAFEESA,MALAPPURAM vs. ITO, TIRUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee allowed

ITA 118/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Pallath Nafeesa The Income Tax Officer Poolakkodan House Tirur Athirumada, Punnathala Vs. Tirur, Malappuram 676552 [Pan: Alipn9300R] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Paulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 10(37)Section 145ASection 194ASection 197Section 28Section 34Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57

section 56(2)(viii) r.w.s. 145A(b) of the Act. In this regard we note that the issue on hand is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of Hon’ble Gujarat High court in the case of Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai vs. ITO-TDS

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 221/COCH/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

TDS. We find that the said amount was added based on the figures found place in the books of account and not based on the incriminating materials seized during the search. Therefore, when the AO made an assessment u/s. 153C of the Act, he cannot make addition u/s. 68 or 69 since the same was not made based

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 222/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

TDS. We find that the said amount was added based on the figures found place in the books of account and not based on the incriminating materials seized during the search. Therefore, when the AO made an assessment u/s. 153C of the Act, he cannot make addition u/s. 68 or 69 since the same was not made based

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 220/COCH/2023[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

TDS. We find that the said amount was added based on the figures found place in the books of account and not based on the incriminating materials seized during the search. Therefore, when the AO made an assessment u/s. 153C of the Act, he cannot make addition u/s. 68 or 69 since the same was not made based

SANTHIMADAM AGROFARM TRUST,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 223/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ilaiyaraja K.S., Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153CSection 194CSection 234ASection 40Section 68Section 69

TDS. We find that the said amount was added based on the figures found place in the books of account and not based on the incriminating materials seized during the search. Therefore, when the AO made an assessment u/s. 153C of the Act, he cannot make addition u/s. 68 or 69 since the same was not made based

IFTHIKAR KARUPPAMVEETIL ABDUL RAHMAN,CHAVAKKAD vs. ITO, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 119/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Divya Ravindran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 144CSection 144C(15)(b)Section 147Section 56Section 57

56 of the Act and applying the deduction available under section 57(iii) of the Act. 5 ITA.No.119/COCH./2024 H. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Assessing Officer erred in hand written the DIN number and not quoting a valid computer-generated DIN on the body of the Assessment Order

GULF ASIA CONTRACTING CO. PVT. LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 1 (1), KOLLAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 388/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Keshav Dubey, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Gulf Asia Contracting Company Pvt. Ltd. .......... Appellant Xxv/812 Srivaldsam, Thevally P.O. Kollam 691009 [Pan: Aaecg1332Q] Vs. Acit, Circle - 1(1) .......... Respondent Aayakar Bavan, Karbala Jn. Kollam 690001 Appellant By: Shri Rajeev, Ca Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 28.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.02.2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 155Section 155(14)Section 219

56,54,378/- appearing as per Form 26AS was not given by the AO despite the claim made for enhancement of TDS credit during the assessment proceedings. The CIT(A), however, denied the claim for enhancement of TDS credit on the ground that the credit for TDS cannot be granted more than the claim of the assessee made

SHRI SURESH GEORGE,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ADIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3, THIRUVANATHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 794/COCH/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Jun 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Aby T.Varkeysuresh George Asstt. Director Of Income Tax Kurichyiel House International Taxation Payippad, Harippad Vs. Thiruvananthapuram Alappuzha 690 556 [Pan:Affpg5853B]

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar Verma, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 192Section 194JSection 9(1)Section 9(1)(vii)

56). Also, the salary of all seafarers is exempt under section 10(6)(viii) of the Act. Both the said provisions, as well as the Board Circular, carefully perused, are reproduced for ready reference: - 6 Suresh George vs. Asst. DIT Scope of total income 5. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the total income of any previous year

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 349/COCH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

56 of the details filed by the ld.AR of the assessee. Accordingly, the mismatch between the TDS statement vis-à-vis the income shown in the books of account was mainly on account of method of accounting adopted by the assessee. In view of the above, the ld.AR submitted that the books of account of the assessee should

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 360/COCH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

56 of the details filed by the ld.AR of the assessee. Accordingly, the mismatch between the TDS statement vis-à-vis the income shown in the books of account was mainly on account of method of accounting adopted by the assessee. In view of the above, the ld.AR submitted that the books of account of the assessee should

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 348/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

56 of the details filed by the ld.AR of the assessee. Accordingly, the mismatch between the TDS statement vis-à-vis the income shown in the books of account was mainly on account of method of accounting adopted by the assessee. In view of the above, the ld.AR submitted that the books of account of the assessee should

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TEHCNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 350/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

56 of the details filed by the ld.AR of the assessee. Accordingly, the mismatch between the TDS statement vis-à-vis the income shown in the books of account was mainly on account of method of accounting adopted by the assessee. In view of the above, the ld.AR submitted that the books of account of the assessee should

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 361/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

56 of the details filed by the ld.AR of the assessee. Accordingly, the mismatch between the TDS statement vis-à-vis the income shown in the books of account was mainly on account of method of accounting adopted by the assessee. In view of the above, the ld.AR submitted that the books of account of the assessee should

VETTUVANTHODI ABDUL AZEEZ,KOZHIKODE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 981/COCH/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.K.Rishal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Leena Lal, Sr.AR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 68

TDS cannot be made in entirety by virtue of 4 ITA Nos.981/Coch/2022. Vettuvanthodi Abdul Azeez. amendment made to sec40(a)(ia) of the Act by the Finance Act 2014. Accordingly, the ld.AR contended that the disallowance can be restricted to Rs. 6,56,700.00 only being 30% of Rs.21,88,997.00. 7. On the contrary, the ld.DR could not controvert

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 436/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

56 of 165 is warranted. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 9,22,75,684/- on account of stock variance is hereby deleted. 55.2 At this juncture, it is also equally important to see whether there was any variation in the quantity between the closing stock in the manner discussed above. In this regard, we find that no such difference

ABDUL GAFOOR MUHAMMED POTTICHI,TAQLIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 517/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

56 of 165 is warranted. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 9,22,75,684/- on account of stock variance is hereby deleted. 55.2 At this juncture, it is also equally important to see whether there was any variation in the quantity between the closing stock in the manner discussed above. In this regard, we find that no such difference

ABDUL GAFOOR MUHAMMED POTTICHI,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 513/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

56 of 165 is warranted. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 9,22,75,684/- on account of stock variance is hereby deleted. 55.2 At this juncture, it is also equally important to see whether there was any variation in the quantity between the closing stock in the manner discussed above. In this regard, we find that no such difference

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI, PARTNER (ABC SALES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 528/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

56 of 165 is warranted. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 9,22,75,684/- on account of stock variance is hereby deleted. 55.2 At this juncture, it is also equally important to see whether there was any variation in the quantity between the closing stock in the manner discussed above. In this regard, we find that no such difference