BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 438clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai198Delhi194Bangalore58Chennai39Pune29Kolkata29Raipur23Jaipur23Hyderabad22Ahmedabad12Cuttack11Chandigarh9Indore9Lucknow6Dehradun5Jodhpur4Allahabad4Cochin4Calcutta3Visakhapatnam2Surat2Karnataka1Rajkot1Guwahati1Telangana1Varanasi1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 234E16Section 200A8TDS4Limitation/Time-bar4

GOVERNMENT MENTAL HOSPITAL,KUTHIRAVATTAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 277/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Richard Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

438 ITR 296 (SC), the learned AR submitted that there is no delay in filing these appeals. The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard. 3. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Cognizance For Extension of Limitation (supra), which has extended the time limit for filing an appeal from time to time

GOVERNMENT MENTAL HOSPITAL,KUTHIRAVATTAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS),, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 276/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Richard Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

438 ITR 296 (SC), the learned AR submitted that there is no delay in filing these appeals. The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard. 3. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Cognizance For Extension of Limitation (supra), which has extended the time limit for filing an appeal from time to time

GOVERNMENT MENTAL HOSPITAL,KUTHIRAVATTAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 275/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Richard Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

438 ITR 296 (SC), the learned AR submitted that there is no delay in filing these appeals. The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard. 3. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Cognizance For Extension of Limitation (supra), which has extended the time limit for filing an appeal from time to time

GOVERNMENT MENTAL HOSPITAL,KUTHIRAVATTAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 278/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Richard Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

438 ITR 296 (SC), the learned AR submitted that there is no delay in filing these appeals. The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard. 3. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Cognizance For Extension of Limitation (supra), which has extended the time limit for filing an appeal from time to time