BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “TDS”+ Section 40Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi553Mumbai498Chennai265Bangalore234Kolkata226Ahmedabad125Hyderabad108Pune94Jaipur86Visakhapatnam57Indore53Chandigarh47Raipur43Rajkot38Cuttack37Cochin28Surat23Amritsar19Lucknow18Guwahati16Nagpur15Patna13Jodhpur12Agra8Karnataka7Ranchi5Varanasi4Jabalpur4Dehradun4Allahabad3Calcutta3Panaji2Telangana1SC1

Key Topics

Section 80P46Section 4027Section 143(3)23Deduction21TDS17Section 26315Section 19515Disallowance15Section 80P(2)(a)14Section 201(1)

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 566/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 37Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

40A(9) of the Act, the claim of deduction made for any payment to superannuation fund must be in accordance with section 36(1)(iv) and 36(1)(v) of the Act. Since the assessee has not been able to prove that it is a recognized provident fund or an approved gratuity fund as mentioned in section

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

10
Section 9(1)(vii)10
Addition to Income8

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 567/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 37Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

40A(9) of the Act, the claim of deduction made for any payment to superannuation fund must be in accordance with section 36(1)(iv) and 36(1)(v) of the Act. Since the assessee has not been able to prove that it is a recognized provident fund or an approved gratuity fund as mentioned in section

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

ITA 579/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

TDS without considering the fact that the said payment is only incentives paid for mobilizing deposits from its members and not a commission payment.” 11. The first ground raised in the above appeal is with reference to grant of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act. We have already considered the issue in ITA No.579/Coch

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

ITA 581/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

TDS without considering the fact that the said payment is only incentives paid for mobilizing deposits from its members and not a commission payment.” 11. The first ground raised in the above appeal is with reference to grant of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act. We have already considered the issue in ITA No.579/Coch

M/S.KERALA STATE CO-OP AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEV BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

ITA 580/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Jose JacobFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

TDS without considering the fact that the said payment is only incentives paid for mobilizing deposits from its members and not a commission payment.” 11. The first ground raised in the above appeal is with reference to grant of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act. We have already considered the issue in ITA No.579/Coch

MR.THOMAS DANIEL,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WARD-4, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 68/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.68/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2014-15

Section 194ASection 40Section 44A

40a(ia) along with 2nd proviso and Section 201(1) along with proviso, it would mean that the mandate or requirement on the part of the payer to deduct tax at source is not so strict if they are able to show that the payee or the recipient of the amounts has paid tax in accordance with the provisions

M/S.VIJAYA PALACE,,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 506/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194ASection 40

TDS. So far as the argument of the ld. Counsel for the assessee that direction may be given to the Assessing Officer to allow such disallowance made in this year in the order of the subsequent years, we hold that the assessee may move appropriate application before the Assessing Officer who shall decide the issue as per fact 5 I.T.A

INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

ITA 592/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.Bineesha Baby,AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.. Leena Lal, Sr, DR
Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 68Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

Section 40A(ia) for disallowance of expenses where TDS was not deducted. The assessee denied the status of the society

P. SURENDRAN,TRIVANDRUM vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 978/COCH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm P. Surendran Sukanya Bhavan Asst. Cit-1(2) Vadayakkadu, Kunnukuzhy, P.O., Thiruvananthapuram Vs. Thiruvananthapuram-695 035

For Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 40A(3)Section 40a

40A(3) would apply in computing the income under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession” and “Income from other sources” as per section 58(2). All payments in excess of Rs.2,500 at one time whether for goods or services obtained for cash or 6 P. Surendran Sukanya Bhavan vs. Asst. CIT credit, which are deductible

M/S.ALLIANZ CORNHILL INFORMATION SERVICES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, ground Nos

ITA 489/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santhom Bose, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(2)(b)Section 156Section 2Section 36(1)(va)Section 40

section 40a(i)/(ia) also. AO is free to inform the concerned TDS authorities regarding non deduction of Tax at source

TANSEER KAJA,KARINGARAPULLY vs. ITO CIRCLE 1, PALAKKAD

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 74/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Aug 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Shameem Ahamed, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

TDS while making payments. Similarly, ld. AO disallowed the payments made to the various parties in cash on a single day exceeding Rs.20,000/- since the same is not in accordance with section 40A

TANSEER KAJA,KARINGARAPULLY vs. ITO CIRCLE 1, PALAKKAD

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 77/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Shameem Ahamed, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

TDS while making payments. Similarly, ld. AO disallowed the payments made to the various parties in cash on a single day exceeding Rs.20,000/- since the same is not in accordance with section 40A

TANSEER KAJA,KARINGARAPULLY vs. ITO CIRCLE 1, PALAKKAD

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 75/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Shameem Ahamed, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

TDS while making payments. Similarly, ld. AO disallowed the payments made to the various parties in cash on a single day exceeding Rs.20,000/- since the same is not in accordance with section 40A

TANSEER KAJA,KARINGARAPULLY vs. ITO CIRCLE 1, PALAKKAD

In the result, all the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 76/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Shameem Ahamed, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

TDS while making payments. Similarly, ld. AO disallowed the payments made to the various parties in cash on a single day exceeding Rs.20,000/- since the same is not in accordance with section 40A

SRI.ABDUL KAREEM,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ITO, ALUVA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 123/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.T.John GeorgeFor Respondent: Sri.Shantom Bose
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 153Section 263Section 28Section 56Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57

TDS of Rs.88,29,502 as refund. The assessment was taken up for scrutiny by issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of the I.T.Act and the assessment u/s 143(3) of the I.T.Act was completed vide order dated 11.11.2016 on a total income of Rs.4,16,014. 4. Subsequently the CIT by invoking his revisionary powers issued notice

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 100/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 99/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 103/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 101/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are

ITA 102/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40aSection 9(1)(vii)

TDS in terms of sec. 40a(ia) of the Act. I.T.A. Nos. 99- 100/C/ 2017 4. After hearing both the parties, we find that a similar issue came up for consideration before this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in I.T.A. No. 222/Coch/2013 for the AY 2007-08. The Tribunal vide order dated 29/07/2017 held as under: “16. We have