BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 279(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi214Mumbai156Karnataka84Chandigarh69Chennai59Bangalore46Kolkata39Hyderabad30Jaipur29Ahmedabad17Cuttack9Raipur9Cochin8Nagpur7Pune7Indore6Lucknow6Rajkot5Surat4Jodhpur3Visakhapatnam2SC2Telangana2Uttarakhand2Agra1Amritsar1Kerala1Rajasthan1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 20118Section 194H9Deduction8Disallowance7TDS6Section 14A4Section 2634Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4Section 201(1)

ASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE PR CIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee

ITA 5/COCH/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Asianet Satellite Vs. Pcit, Communications Pvt. Ltd., Thiruvananthapuram. 2A, 2Nd Floor, Carnival Technopark, Technopark, Kazhakuttom, Karyavattom, P. O., Thiruvananthapuram. Pan : Aaeca 5548 E Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri. Raghunathan S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. M. Rajasekhar, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263Section 37Section 37(1)

TDS 98,53,799 Service Tax Interest (Tvm) 8,49,279 Total 1,07,06,264 3. The AO did not pass any final order u/s.154. In the meanwhile the PCIT, on verification of assessment records, noticed that the same issue where the assessee has debited an amount of Rs.1,07,06,000/- towards interest on delayed payment of service

3
Section 143(1)2
Section 1952

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MINI MUTHOOTTU CREDIT INDIA P. LTD, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 237/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.237/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Mini Muthoottu Credit India Income-Tax, Circle-1, Thiruvalla. (P) Ltd., Muthoot Building, Kozhencherry-689 641. [Pan: Aaecm 5739P]

Section 250Section 36(1)(iii)

279/- made by the Assessing Officer and deleted the same. 4. Against this, the Revenue is in appeal before us. The Ld. DR submitted that objective and actual business of assessee over the years was to provide asset management service to various customers directly from customer’s data available in various branches of Muthuttu Mini Group of Companies

M/S.KADUNA HOSPITALITY P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 500/COCH/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P. K. Bansal & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 145ASection 45Section 45(5)(b)Section 48

279 LA 24/09 921,713 6,962,936 3,961,551 11,846,200 LA 25/09 1,543,381 11,691,079 6,639,049 19,873,510 Total 2,535,526 19,187,124 10,903,339 32,625,989 8 I.T.A.No.500/Coch/2016 3 The additional compensation has been received/credited on the following dates, Date Particulars Rs. Sub total

M/S.PARCO DIAGNOSTICS & REASEARCH CENTRE P. LTD,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT(TDS), CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 456/COCH/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jun 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: George George K.

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

TDS), Kozhikode. Meenchanda, Kozhikode. [PAN:AABCP 3576A] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Revenue by Shri C. Suresh Kumar, CA Assessee by Shri A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR Date of hearing 29/05/2017 Date of pronouncement 08/06/2017 O R D E R Per GEORGE GEORGE K.,JUDICIAL MEMBER: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the consolidated order

M/S.PARCO DIAGNOSTICS & REASEARCH CENTRE P. LTD,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT(TDS), CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 458/COCH/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jun 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: George George K.

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

TDS), Kozhikode. Meenchanda, Kozhikode. [PAN:AABCP 3576A] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Revenue by Shri C. Suresh Kumar, CA Assessee by Shri A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR Date of hearing 29/05/2017 Date of pronouncement 08/06/2017 O R D E R Per GEORGE GEORGE K.,JUDICIAL MEMBER: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the consolidated order

M/S.PARCO DIAGNOSTICS & REASEARCH CENTRE P. LTD,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT(TDS), CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jun 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: George George K.

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

TDS), Kozhikode. Meenchanda, Kozhikode. [PAN:AABCP 3576A] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Revenue by Shri C. Suresh Kumar, CA Assessee by Shri A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR Date of hearing 29/05/2017 Date of pronouncement 08/06/2017 O R D E R Per GEORGE GEORGE K.,JUDICIAL MEMBER: These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the consolidated order

INDIA GATEWAY TERMINAL PRIVATE LIMITED ,ICTT, VALLARPADAM vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CIRCLE 1(2), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 546/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Ms. Remya S. Menon, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 195Section 40

1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at a total loss of Rs. 4,47,28,321/-. While doing so, the AO made disallowance or the management fees payable to M/s. Dubai Port World of Rs. 2,93,59,617/- on the ground that the appellant had failed to deduct tax at source under the provisions of section

INDIA GATEWAY TERMINAL PRIVATE LIMITED,ICTT, VALLARPADAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(2), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 545/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Feb 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Ms. Remya S. Menon, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 195Section 40

1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at a total loss of Rs. 4,47,28,321/-. While doing so, the AO made disallowance or the management fees payable to M/s. Dubai Port World of Rs. 2,93,59,617/- on the ground that the appellant had failed to deduct tax at source under the provisions of section