BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 26Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai93Bangalore91Delhi65Chennai38Jaipur30Kolkata28Indore15Ahmedabad13Raipur12Surat12Chandigarh9Cochin6Pune6Guwahati5Hyderabad5Jodhpur4Visakhapatnam3Cuttack3Rajkot3Varanasi3Karnataka2Panaji2Jabalpur1Amritsar1Agra1Ranchi1Allahabad1Nagpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 194A18Section 2016TDS6Deduction5Condonation of Delay5Section 2504Section 201(1)4Section 102

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 958/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

26A. However, the TDS returns filed by the Appellant for subsequent year when TDS was deducted and paid ought to have been considered by the authorities below. Based thereon if at all interest for delayed payment of TDS alone could have been demanded and the assessment under Section

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 959/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

26A. However, the TDS returns filed by the Appellant for subsequent year when TDS was deducted and paid ought to have been considered by the authorities below. Based thereon if at all interest for delayed payment of TDS alone could have been demanded and the assessment under Section

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 960/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

26A. However, the TDS returns filed by the Appellant for subsequent year when TDS was deducted and paid ought to have been considered by the authorities below. Based thereon if at all interest for delayed payment of TDS alone could have been demanded and the assessment under Section

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 961/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

26A. However, the TDS returns filed by the Appellant for subsequent year when TDS was deducted and paid ought to have been considered by the authorities below. Based thereon if at all interest for delayed payment of TDS alone could have been demanded and the assessment under Section

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. DCIT,TDS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1061/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Naresh C., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 194ASection 201Section 297

TDS 2 AAATF0888P PROVINCIAL 29,60,017 26A furnished for FY: 2014- 206,932/- & BURSAR 15 shows that Rs.890,694/- only was taken as interest income from SIB. The deductor claimed that the remaining amount of Rs.20,69,323/- was shown in FY: 2015-16. However, neither the computation nor the 26A for FY: 2015-16 is clear

K. THOMAS VARGHESE,PIRAVAM vs. THE ACIT, ALUVA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 83/COCH/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahushri K. Thomas Varghese Acit, Circle - 1 Manakunnathu Aluva Vs. Piravom 686664 Pan – Aaspv5029L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Lokanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 194ASection 40

TDS under section 194A and not an item disallowable U/S 40(a)(i) of the Act. The appellant was denied an opportunity to furnish certificate in Form No. 26A