BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

51 results for “TDS”+ Section 249(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai321Delhi270Chennai131Bangalore108Karnataka89Raipur63Chandigarh60Kolkata52Cochin51Jaipur43Ahmedabad37Pune30Hyderabad30Indore23Surat22Lucknow18Visakhapatnam17Amritsar9Cuttack7Rajkot6Agra4Varanasi4Nagpur3Guwahati3Jodhpur2Panaji2Telangana2Dehradun1Patna1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 200A(1)116Section 234E98Section 234E(1)76TDS50Section 20042Deduction41Section 200A40Section 200(3)38Natural Justice10Limitation/Time-bar

M/S ST. ALPHONSA TIMBERS & TRADERS (PVT) LTD,MARADU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 888/COCH/2022[QUARTER-II 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Jun 2023

Bench: SHRI SANJAY ARORA (Accountant Member), SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. Rajeev, (Adv)For Respondent: Smt J. M Jamuna Devi, (Sr. AR)
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 220(2)Section 234Section 234E

3) of section 206C.” 9. Interpreting Section 200A and Section 234E, the Karnataka High Court has held in Fatheraj that when the statute confers no express power under section 200A before 01.06.2015 on the authority either to compute and collect any fee under section 234E, the demand for the period before 01.06.2015 could not be sustained. Fatheraj in fact observes

Showing 1–20 of 51 · Page 1 of 3

10
Section 2346
Section 54F6

M/S ST. ALPHONSA TIMBERS AND TRADERS (PVT) LTD,MARADU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 887/COCH/2022[QUARTER-IV 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Jun 2023

Bench: SHRI SANJAY ARORA (Accountant Member), SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri S. Rajeev, (Adv)For Respondent: Smt J. M Jamuna Devi, (Sr. AR)
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 220(2)Section 234Section 234E

3) of section 206C.” 9. Interpreting Section 200A and Section 234E, the Karnataka High Court has held in Fatheraj that when the statute confers no express power under section 200A before 01.06.2015 on the authority either to compute and collect any fee under section 234E, the demand for the period before 01.06.2015 could not be sustained. Fatheraj in fact observes

ROSE GEORGE KOLLANUR,THRISSUR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), THRISSUR, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 610/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Dec 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri V Ramnath, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54F

249 2000 Received 4. ICICI Bank 036676 21.10.2013 Part of 770353 256 Booking TDS Online 21.10.2013 TDS 7782 259 7782 Received 5. 036686 28.06.2014 Part 968354321 6. ICICI Bank ICICI Bank Online 20.07.2014 TDS 9782 426 9782 Received 7. ICICI Bank 036689 24.12.2014 Part 733601 538 7031 Received 8. 088355 16.05.2015 Part 733601 776 7031 Received 9. ICICI Bank

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 252/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 263/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 260/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 258/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 259/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES ,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 249/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES ,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 251/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 262/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES ,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 250/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

TIPTOP FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,KOTTAKKAL vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 261/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Mar 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri M. Balaganesh, Am

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Poulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 234E

249 to 252/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15) ITA Nos. 258 to 263/Coch/2021 (Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2015-16) M/s. Tip Top Furniture Industries ACIT, Centralized Processing PGP 8/437, Shanti Nagar Cell - TDS Vs. Parappur, Kottakkal Ghaziabad - 201010 Malappuram 676503, PAN – AABFT5528K Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Shri Shaji Poulose, CA Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, ONCHIYAM BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 801/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, ONCHIYAM BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 798/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, UNNIKULAM BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 815/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, ONCHIYAM BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 797/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, OTHUKKUNGAL BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 820/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, UNNIKULAM BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 813/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, IRUMBUZHI BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 819/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm

For Appellant: Written Submissions (through S/Sh. Pratik Sadrani, HardikFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 234E(1)

TDS returns in the instant case are themselves filed after 01/6/2015; rather, being so only in view of the law, w.e.f 01/10/2014, enabling so by providing for filing of a correction statement. And, therefore, could be processed only subsequent to 31/5/2015, after which date the power of determining the levy u/s. 234E while processing the return is available. That would