BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “TDS”+ Section 226(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi350Mumbai294Chennai188Karnataka168Bangalore132Kolkata94Raipur88Ahmedabad60Jaipur59Pune56Hyderabad52Dehradun31Indore30Chandigarh28Jodhpur23Cuttack16Cochin14Rajkot14Lucknow13Visakhapatnam10Amritsar9Nagpur8Surat6Jabalpur6Guwahati6Panaji5Patna4Kerala3SC3Agra2Telangana2Allahabad2Ranchi1Orissa1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)40Section 271C30Section 20125Section 4014TDS12Section 194J10Penalty10Deduction4Section 143(3)2Section 194A

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 615/COCH/2010[09-Aug]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

2
Disallowance2

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 610/COCH/2010[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 609/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 606/COCH/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 611/COCH/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 614/COCH/2010[007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 608/COCH/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 613/COCH/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 612/COCH/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 607/COCH/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

226 (SC) [Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax]. The relevant paragraph is quoted hereunder:- "Be that as it may, circular No. 275/ 201/95-IT(B) dated January 29, 1997, issued by the central Board of Direct Taxes, in our considered opinion, should put an end to the controversy. The circular dec1ares "no demand visualized under section

CANARA BANK,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT (TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 474/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194ASection 201

3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The CIT(A) has erred in charging interest u/s. 201(1A) from the date on which tax was deductable and upto 31/03/2015 ignoring the contention of the appellant that Supreme Court has held in Hindusthan Coca-Cola case (245 ITR 13) that interest u/s. 201(1A) should be charged

ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.TIME ADS & PUBLICITY, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 226/COCH/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

3 ITA Nos.226/C/2012 & 27/C/2023 (AY 2008-2009) Time Ads & Publicity v. Asst. CIT same cannot, clearly, be regarded as the ratio decidendi of the said decision. As explained in CIT vs. Prakash Chand Lunia [2023] 454 ITR 61 (SC), for a precedent to be binding there has to be a conscious consideration of an issue involved.It is, again, well-settled

TIME ADS & PUBLICITY,KOCHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(2), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes, and the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 27/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sajit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

3 ITA Nos.226/C/2012 & 27/C/2023 (AY 2008-2009) Time Ads & Publicity v. Asst. CIT same cannot, clearly, be regarded as the ratio decidendi of the said decision. As explained in CIT vs. Prakash Chand Lunia [2023] 454 ITR 61 (SC), for a precedent to be binding there has to be a conscious consideration of an issue involved.It is, again, well-settled

STATE BANK OF INDIA , THALASSERY( ERSTWHILE STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE),KANNUR vs. ITO (TDS), KANNUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 926/COCH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalstate Bank Of India (Erstwhile Sbt) Income Tax Officer-Tds Thalassery Branch Aayakar Bhavan Gundert Road Vs. Konnothumchal Thalassery 670101 Chovva P.O., Kannur 670006 [Pan: Aaacs8577K] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A. Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 10(5)Section 12Section 192Section 201Section 286

sections will have to be considered for the purpose. As we see it, the matter is principally factual, as the question of existence or otherwise of ‘sufficient cause’ invariably is. It is nobody’s case, nor could be, that the email, even if it came to the notice of the staff, it would yet be entitled to ignore