BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

50 results for “TDS”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi351Mumbai281Bangalore261Chennai115Karnataka114Raipur92Kolkata80Chandigarh67Hyderabad59Jaipur57Cochin50Pune44Ahmedabad34Ranchi29Indore22Visakhapatnam18Jodhpur17Guwahati15Lucknow14Surat14Cuttack14Varanasi8Allahabad7Rajkot7Nagpur6Telangana4SC3Jabalpur3Patna2Amritsar1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)55Addition to Income30Section 194J25Section 4022Section 194C19Deduction19TDS18Section 15412Section 143(3)11Section 194

THE STATE MEDICAL COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION,TRICHUR vs. THE ITO,(TDS),TRICHUR, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 20/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS) (ITA Nos. 503 & 510/B/2011 order dated 22/03/2013). 9.2 Further, sub-section (2) and (3) of section 194J provided for a certificate of nil deduction or deduction at a lower rate on which the deductor could act if issued by the Assessing Officer. These sections have been shifted to section 197

THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION,TRICHUR vs. THE ITO(TDS), TRICHUR, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for

Showing 1–20 of 50 · Page 1 of 3

10
Capital Gains9
Section 2(24)(vi)8
ITA 18/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Cochin
17 May 2019
AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS) (ITA Nos. 503 & 510/B/2011 order dated 22/03/2013). 9.2 Further, sub-section (2) and (3) of section 194J provided for a certificate of nil deduction or deduction at a lower rate on which the deductor could act if issued by the Assessing Officer. These sections have been shifted to section 197

THE STATE MEDICAL COMMISSIONER,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO,TDS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 21/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS) (ITA Nos. 503 & 510/B/2011 order dated 22/03/2013). 9.2 Further, sub-section (2) and (3) of section 194J provided for a certificate of nil deduction or deduction at a lower rate on which the deductor could act if issued by the Assessing Officer. These sections have been shifted to section 197

THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN, ,TRICHUR vs. THE ITO(TDS),, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 19/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS) (ITA Nos. 503 & 510/B/2011 order dated 22/03/2013). 9.2 Further, sub-section (2) and (3) of section 194J provided for a certificate of nil deduction or deduction at a lower rate on which the deductor could act if issued by the Assessing Officer. These sections have been shifted to section 197

THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION,TRICHUR vs. THE ITO(TDS), TRICHUR, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 633/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS) (ITA Nos. 503 & 510/B/2011 order dated 22/03/2013). 9.2 Further, sub-section (2) and (3) of section 194J provided for a certificate of nil deduction or deduction at a lower rate on which the deductor could act if issued by the Assessing Officer. These sections have been shifted to section 197

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD,COCHIN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 01.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35Section 43(1)Section 92C

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

QATAR AIRWAYS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 23/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajeev. RFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 197Section 201(1)

TDS as prescribed under section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The said error was corrected by filing necessary correction

QATAR AIRWAYS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 25/COCH/2018[2009-10(Qtr-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajeev. RFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 197Section 201(1)

TDS as prescribed under section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The said error was corrected by filing necessary correction

QATAR AIRWAYS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 26/COCH/2018[2009-10 (Qutr-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajeev. RFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 197Section 201(1)

TDS as prescribed under section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The said error was corrected by filing necessary correction

QATAR AIRWAYS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 27/COCH/2018[2009-10 (Qtr-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajeev. RFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 197Section 201(1)

TDS as prescribed under section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The said error was corrected by filing necessary correction

QATAR AIRWAYS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 24/COCH/2018[2009-10 (Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajeev. RFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 197Section 201(1)

TDS as prescribed under section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The said error was corrected by filing necessary correction

QATAR AIRWAYS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 28/COCH/2018[2011-12( Qtr-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Rajeev. RFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 154Section 197Section 201(1)

TDS as prescribed under section 197 of the Income Tax Act. The said error was corrected by filing necessary correction

M/S AC CARGO MANAGEMENT P.LTD,,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 320/COCH/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri George George. K.] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 320/Coch/2013. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2007-2008. Vs. M/S. Ac Cargo Management The Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd, Ward 1(1) 1St Floor, Chacko Chambers, Kochi Civil Lines Road, Palarivattom, Kochi 682 025. [Pan Aaeca 2206K] (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" (ू"यथ" ू"यथ" ू"यथ"/Respondent) ू"यथ"

For Appellant: Shri. R. Krishnan, C.A
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 40

TDS has to be made under section 194 C or 194 I. In the case of ACIT vs. Accenture Services (P) Ltd. 44 SOT 290 (Mum) (wherein one of us, the J.M. is a party) the issue wasconsidered in detail as under: - “7. We have considered the rival contentions and relevant record. The short controversy in this case is regarding

MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 465/COCH/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 40

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 464/COCH/2025[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 40

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED,TRIVANDRUM vs. ITO,CIRCLE CENTRAL, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 496/COCH/2025[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 40

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

PALLATH NAFEESA,MALAPPURAM vs. ITO, TIRUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee allowed

ITA 118/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Pallath Nafeesa The Income Tax Officer Poolakkodan House Tirur Athirumada, Punnathala Vs. Tirur, Malappuram 676552 [Pan: Alipn9300R] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Paulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 10(37)Section 145ASection 194ASection 197Section 28Section 34Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57

TDS reported in70 taxmann.com 45. The relevant finding of the Hon’ble Bench is extracted as under: “10. In the facts of the present case, it is an admitted position that the interest on which the tax is sought to be deducted at source under section 194A of the Act is interest under section

SRI.V.J.FRANCIS M/S.LISCO COIR TEX,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 64/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Written submission by Smt.Lakshmi N., CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 17(2)Section 192Section 194Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act be given retrospective application. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT Appeals was not justified in sustaining the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on Professional Charges 72,917 by failing to take into consideration the necessary documents as provided in second proviso

SRI.V.J.FRANCIS M/S.LISCO COIR TEX,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Written submission by Smt.Lakshmi N., CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 17(2)Section 192Section 194Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act be given retrospective application. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned CIT Appeals was not justified in sustaining the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on Professional Charges 72,917 by failing to take into consideration the necessary documents as provided in second proviso

ROSE GEORGE KOLLANUR,THRISSUR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), THRISSUR, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 610/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Dec 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri V Ramnath, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54F

197 ITR 110 Bang, reinforced this point and exemption was granted on the same grounds. There are additional precedents which include I.T.O. vs. R. Srinivas I.T.A. No. 79/Bang/2014 and I. TO vs. Hiralal K Jain ITA No. 1176/Mds/2010. Moreover, it is not disputed by the A.O. that the assessee has invested the capital gains in a residential property within three