BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi200Mumbai189Kolkata91Bangalore36Ahmedabad29Jaipur22Raipur18Chennai13Pune12Visakhapatnam9Cochin9Cuttack8Hyderabad8Jabalpur7Karnataka4Chandigarh4Varanasi3Surat3Jodhpur2Nagpur2Indore2Telangana2Guwahati1Kerala1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 194C11Section 409TDS7Section 194I6Section 1946Section 144C(5)4Section 271C4Disallowance4Depreciation4Section 65

ITO, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.SOUTHERN MINERAL INDUSTRIES,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 370/COCH/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri P. K. Bansal & Shri George George K.

Section 194CSection 194ISection 201

TDS under section 194C, 194H and 194I of the Act and also created the demand and levied interest under section

M/S AC CARGO MANAGEMENT P.LTD,,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 320/COCH/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Shri Abraham P. George & Shri George George. K.] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 320/Coch/2013. िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2007-2008. Vs. M/S. Ac Cargo Management The Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd, Ward 1(1) 1St Floor, Chacko Chambers, Kochi Civil Lines Road, Palarivattom, Kochi 682 025. [Pan Aaeca 2206K] (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" (ू"यथ" ू"यथ" ू"यथ"/Respondent) ू"यथ"

3
Section 273B3
Addition to Income2
Bench:
For Appellant: Shri. R. Krishnan, C.A
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 40

TDS as mandated under section 194 I of the Act. Argument of the assessee on this aspect was as under:- ‘’With reference the above notice we submit that we are not liable to deduct tax at source in respect qt the "Truck lease charges. We hire the Trucks for our business and there is no agreement for carrying

M/S.ALLKOSHYS ALL SPICES,KOTTAYAM vs. THE ITO, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 340/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194ISection 40

194I is to be made and since the assessee failed to deduct TDS, disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act was justified

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

ITA 475/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santham Bose, CIT-DR
Section 144C(5)Section 190Section 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 92C(3)

194I for such reimbursement of salary costs and rentals, respectively. 4.4 The DC IT and DRP have erred in not considering the notwithstanding provisions laid out under section 190 of the Act wherein it is clarified that the tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B, only in respect of payments of "income" or "any sum" comprising an element

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

ITA 134/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Raghunathan S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri. Santham Bose, CIT-DR
Section 144C(5)Section 190Section 194JSection 234BSection 40Section 92C(3)

194I for such reimbursement of salary costs and rentals, respectively. 4.4 The DC IT and DRP have erred in not considering the notwithstanding provisions laid out under section 190 of the Act wherein it is clarified that the tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B, only in respect of payments of "income" or "any sum" comprising an element

M/S.VIJAYA HOSPITALITY AND RESORTS LTD,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ADCIT(TDS), COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 96/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Cochin24 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Thomas Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 271CSection 273Section 273B

194I and 192B of the I.T.Act. 9.3 The Full Bench of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Lakshadweep Development Corporation Ltd. v. Addl.CIT & Anr. (supra) while reversing the Division Bench ruling in the case of U S Technology International Limited (supra), had held that section 273B of the I.T.Act shall be applicable for also the cases

USHA JOHNSON,KOLLAM vs. ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 752/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 65

TDS was deducted by IOCL and BPCL u/s. 194C of the I.T. Act. Further, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has not included any income from hiring of vehicles in the profit and loss account. After examination of the work order/contract note issued by IOCL to assessee, the Assessing Officer was of the view that the assessee was engaged

USHA JOHNSON,KOLLAM vs. ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 750/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 65

TDS was deducted by IOCL and BPCL u/s. 194C of the I.T. Act. Further, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has not included any income from hiring of vehicles in the profit and loss account. After examination of the work order/contract note issued by IOCL to assessee, the Assessing Officer was of the view that the assessee was engaged

USHA JOHNSON,KOLLAM vs. ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 751/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 65

TDS was deducted by IOCL and BPCL u/s. 194C of the I.T. Act. Further, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has not included any income from hiring of vehicles in the profit and loss account. After examination of the work order/contract note issued by IOCL to assessee, the Assessing Officer was of the view that the assessee was engaged