M/S.KADUTHURUTHY REGIONAL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. THE JT IT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathankaduthuruthy Regional Service Joint Commissioner Of Co-Op Bank Ltd. Income Tax (Tds) Vs. Kaduthuruthuy P.O. Trivandrum Kottayam Pan – Aaajk0315Q Appellant Respondent

194A of the Income Tax Act 1969. B. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in arriving into a conclusion that the Income tax Officer (TDS) is an authority to call for information under Section 133(6) of Income tax Act without appreciating the fact that

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR TRADERS, PATHANMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO (TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR PRINTERS, PATHANAMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO (TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR PRINTERS, PATHANAMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO (TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR PRINTERS, PATHANAMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR TRADERS,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR TRADERS,PATHANMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR TRADERS,PATHANMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR PRINTERS,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO (TDS), ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR DEALERS,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR DEALERS,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

M/S.POPULAR DEALERS,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR TRADERS, PATHANMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR TRADERS, PATHANMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR TRADERS, PATHANMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR DEALERS, PATHANAMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR DEALERS, PATHANAMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding

THE ITO,(TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.POPULAR DEALERS, PATHANAMTHITTA

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

3. Thomas Muthoot v. DCIT (TDS) (2012) 28 taxmann.com 25 (Coch) 4. Allahabad Bank v. ITO in ITA No.5992 to 5994/Del/2012 of Delhi Bench of ITAT. The above supports the following ground No.2 raised in the appeal memorandum.” 6.2 The above contention of the assessee in short is that there should be proceedings against the deductee/payee and the finding