Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai354 Delhi246 Bangalore149 Nagpur105 Chennai103 Chandigarh99 Kolkata78 Karnataka57 Pune51 Jaipur51 Ahmedabad41 Hyderabad36 Visakhapatnam19 Cochin18 Panaji13 Rajkot12 Raipur12 Jodhpur10 Surat8 SC8 Telangana8 Indore6 Jabalpur5 Cuttack5 Ranchi4 Kerala4 Lucknow4 Amritsar3 Patna3 Allahabad3 Guwahati2 J&K2

Key Topics

Section 194A33 Section 197A30 Deduction17 TDS17 Section 20116 Section 26315 Section 4013 Section 143(3)12 Section 201(1)9 Section 80P

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 958/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS under Section 194A of the Act. The above contetnion of the assessee is devoid of any merit. Section 194A

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

6

Addition to Income6

Condonation of Delay5

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 959/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS under Section 194A of the Act. The above contetnion of the assessee is devoid of any merit. Section 194A

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 960/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS under Section 194A of the Act. The above contetnion of the assessee is devoid of any merit. Section 194A

M/S WAYANAD DIST. CO.OP BANK LTD.,WAYANAD vs. ITO(TDS), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 961/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jammuna Devi, Sr. DR

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS under Section 194A of the Act. The above contetnion of the assessee is devoid of any merit. Section 194A

THOMAS JOHN MUTHOOT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1 , THIRUVALLA, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 896/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Thomas John Muthoot Dcit, Circle - 1 Muthoot Centre, Punnen Road Thiruvalla Vs. Thiruvananthapuram 695001 [Pan: Abnpt4694B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Srinivasan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das

Section 194ASection 40

TDS under the provisions of section 194A r.w.s. 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the Act amounting

MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 465/COCH/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 40

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED,TRIVANDRUM vs. ITO,CIRCLE CENTRAL, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 496/COCH/2025[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 40

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 464/COCH/2025[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194CSection 40

TDS only on a sum of Rs. 1,32,42,920/- and on the balance amount no tax was deducted at source treating it as mere reimbursement of expenditure to MPCMS. The said payee, i.e. MPCMS also raised different bills. The AO was of the opinion that the money paid towards management consultancy charges under composite contract and the contract

ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ITO, TDS WARD, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 645/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Anandan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 133ASection 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

194A of the Act in respect of interest payments exceeding Rs. 2,50,000/-, Rs.3,00,000/-, Rs. 5,00,000/- etc. paid to senior citizens by accepting invalid Form 15G/H. Accordingly, the TDS officer was of the opinion that the appellant had failed to comply with the provisions of Chapter XVIIB of the Act and held that the appellant

ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ITO, TDS WARD, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 646/COCH/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Anandan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 133ASection 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

194A of the Act in respect of interest payments exceeding Rs. 2,50,000/-, Rs.3,00,000/-, Rs. 5,00,000/- etc. paid to senior citizens by accepting invalid Form 15G/H. Accordingly, the TDS officer was of the opinion that the appellant had failed to comply with the provisions of Chapter XVIIB of the Act and held that the appellant

ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ITO, TDS WARD, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 647/COCH/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Anandan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 133ASection 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

194A of the Act in respect of interest payments exceeding Rs. 2,50,000/-, Rs.3,00,000/-, Rs. 5,00,000/- etc. paid to senior citizens by accepting invalid Form 15G/H. Accordingly, the TDS officer was of the opinion that the appellant had failed to comply with the provisions of Chapter XVIIB of the Act and held that the appellant

ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ITO, TDS WARD, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 648/COCH/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Anandan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 133ASection 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

194A of the Act in respect of interest payments exceeding Rs. 2,50,000/-, Rs.3,00,000/-, Rs. 5,00,000/- etc. paid to senior citizens by accepting invalid Form 15G/H. Accordingly, the TDS officer was of the opinion that the appellant had failed to comply with the provisions of Chapter XVIIB of the Act and held that the appellant

ESAF SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ITO, TDS WARD, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 277/COCH/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm Assessment Year: 2021-22 Esaf Small Finance Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant Building No. Vii/83//8,Esaf Bhavan, Thirssur- Palakkad Nh, Mannuthy P.O., Thrissur 680651 [Pan: Aaece2619Q] Vs. The Income Tax Officer - Tds, Thrissur .......... Respondent Appellant By: Shri Anandan, Ca Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 28.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.06.2025

For Appellant: Shri Anandan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 133ASection 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)

194A of the Act in respect of interest payments exceeding Rs. 2,50,000/-, Rs.3,00,000/-, Rs. 5,00,000/- etc. paid to senior citizens by accepting invalid Form 15G/H. Accordingly, the TDS officer was of the opinion that the appellant had failed to comply with the provisions of Chapter XVIIB of the Act and held that the appellant

PALLATH NAFEESA,MALAPPURAM vs. ITO, TIRUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee allowed

ITA 118/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Pallath Nafeesa The Income Tax Officer Poolakkodan House Tirur Athirumada, Punnathala Vs. Tirur, Malappuram 676552 [Pan: Alipn9300R] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Shaji Paulose, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R

Section 10(37)Section 145ASection 194ASection 197Section 28Section 34Section 56(2)(viii)Section 57

TDS reported in70 taxmann.com 45. The relevant finding of the Hon’ble Bench is extracted as under: “10. In the facts of the present case, it is an admitted position that the interest on which the tax is sought to be deducted at source under section 194A

KERALA SHIPPING AND INLAND NAVIGATION CORPORATION LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 78/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Kerala Shipping & Inalnd Dcit, Corporate Circle - 1(1) Navigtation Corporation C.R. Building, I.S. Pres Road 38/924-A, Udaya Nagar Road Kochi 682018 Vs. Gandhi Nagar Kochi 682020 [Pan: Aabck4818L] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 1Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 199Section 263Section 69Section 69C

194A amounting to Rs.14,48,767/- in the ITR. Whereas in the 4 Kerala Shipping and Inalnd Navigtation Corporation 26AS for the FY 2017-18 assessee has received a total Interest income of Rs.1,44,87,670/-. The assessee has claimed TDS credit due to him for the AY 2017-18 in the AY 2018-19 which should not have

BHARATH RASIKLAL SHAH,COCHIN vs. PCIT KOCHI-1, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 744/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Advocate &

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 194ASection 263Section 263(1)

Section 263 order would expose him to the threat of vindicative action by the Assessing Officer (NFAC) u/s 144 (Best judgment assessment) as the same is based on the grounds of erroneous assessment and prejudicial to the revenue. The apprehension gains more significance as the PCIT is aware that the Appellant has already submitted that he has deposited original sales

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. DCIT,TDS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1061/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Naresh C., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

Section 10Section 194ASection 201Section 297

194A of the Act after accepting Form 15H form the persons who are not eligible to submit the same. Accordingly, the appellant bank was asked to explain as to why it should not be treated as assessee in default u/s. 201 of the Act. In response to the show cause notice the appellant filed a detailed explanation. Finally, after considering

VADAKKEVILA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. THE ITO, KOLLAM

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 478/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms.Anoopa, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and permissible deduction of interest income is limited to Co-operative Societies/Banks registered under Kerala Co- operative Societies Act under clause (d) of the Act and effect order on 18 ITA No.478/Coch/2023. Vadakkevila SCB Ltd. the above lines is made by the Assessing Officer. The questions are accordingly answered.” 9. We thus accept the assessee