EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MALAPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

Section 192 of the Act for non-deduction TDS at source and further as per Section 206AA of the Act the employer

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,EDARIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) (TDS) KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

Section 192 of the Act for non-deduction TDS at source and further as per Section 206AA of the Act the employer

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,EDARIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) (TDS) KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

Section 192 of the Act for non-deduction TDS at source and further as per Section 206AA of the Act the employer

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,EDARIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) (TDS) KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

Section 192 of the Act for non-deduction TDS at source and further as per Section 206AA of the Act the employer

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), ALAPPUZHA vs. MUTHOOT HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LIMITED, KOZHENCHERRY

Accordingly, we decline to interfere with the same. Thus, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

TDS under Section 192, or 'professional fees' taxable under Section 28, requiring TDS under Section 194J. The determination hinges on whether

MR. PREM MUKUNDAN ,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ITO WARD-2(2), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George George K. (Judicial Member), Ms. Padmavathy S. (Accountant Member)

TDS credit of his deceased wife (admittedly income of the same was offered to tax in assessee’s return of income). The relevant statutory provision, namely Section 199 of the Act and Rule 37BA of the I.T. Rules, 1962 reads as follows: - “Credit for tax deducted. 199. (1) Any deduction made in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Chapter

THE ITO (TDS), KOTTAYAM vs. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 192(2A) of the Income Tax Act, for TDS purposes, has clearly mentioned an employee of the University separately

THE ITO (TDS), KOTTAYAM vs. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 192(2A) of the Income Tax Act, for TDS purposes, has clearly mentioned an employee of the University separately

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

TDS returns/statements (in Form 24Q & 26Q) for FY 2015-16 to FY 2018-19, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Income Tax Department [CIT(A)] vide his separate orders dated 30.08.2022. 2. The appeals raising a common issue, were taken up together for hearing, and are being accordingly disposed of per a common, consolidated order. 3. The appeals, filed