BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

95 results for “TDS”+ Section 149clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi453Mumbai386Bangalore272Chennai141Hyderabad114Chandigarh107Karnataka97Cochin95Ahmedabad83Jaipur69Raipur60Kolkata51Pune49Dehradun29Lucknow29Indore23Cuttack16Agra16Nagpur12Visakhapatnam9Amritsar9Guwahati9Jodhpur9Rajkot9Surat9Kerala5Allahabad3SC2Patna2Varanasi2Jabalpur2Telangana1Calcutta1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 250115Section 19237Section 20033Section 206C33Addition to Income23TDS16Section 234E11Limitation/Time-bar11Section 194J4Survey u/s 133A

A & B ASSOCIATES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 643/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by directing the AO to -

For Appellant: Shri Lokanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Sr. D/R
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

TDS. As the business was not profitable, and for some other major reasons, the relationship between the partners was substantially damaged and the partners had lost confidence between them. After some preliminary legal steps, they have decided to dissolve the firm and 4 A&B Associates accordingly, the firm was dissolved w.e.f. 05/07/2018 on the condition that the business will

Showing 1–20 of 95 · Page 1 of 5

4
Section 1472
Section 148A2

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 992/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 990/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 994/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 984/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 989/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 991/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 987/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 985/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 993/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 988/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 986/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

section. 6. We may next tabulate, for ready comprehension, default/s for which the impugned fee u/s. 234E stands levied: Return Short Total S. Date of Date of Late Fee ITA No. Quarter/A.Y Form Deduction (R/off) No. Filing Processing U/s 234E No. & Interest Rs. 1 985/C/2022 Q2/2016-17 03.06.2021 07.06.2021 26Q 4,08,400 - 4,08,400 2 986/C/2022 Q3/2016-17

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM vs. ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED , ERNAKULAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 162/COCH/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 194J

section 192 of the Act and raised a tax demand of Rs. 1,63,11,275/- and interest of Rs. 1,23,96,569/- U/s. 201(1A) of the Act for the AY 2017-18 vide order dated 19/01/2024. 7. Being aggrieved by the above order, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order considering

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI vs. ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED, ERNAKULAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 160/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 194J

section 192 of the Act and raised a tax demand of Rs. 1,63,11,275/- and interest of Rs. 1,23,96,569/- U/s. 201(1A) of the Act for the AY 2017-18 vide order dated 19/01/2024. 7. Being aggrieved by the above order, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order considering

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI vs. ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED , ERNAKULAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 161/COCH/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 194J

section 192 of the Act and raised a tax demand of Rs. 1,63,11,275/- and interest of Rs. 1,23,96,569/- U/s. 201(1A) of the Act for the AY 2017-18 vide order dated 19/01/2024. 7. Being aggrieved by the above order, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order considering

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KOCHI, ERNAKULAM vs. ASTER DM HEALTHCARE LIMITED, ERNAKULAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 163/COCH/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Jul 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 194J

section 192 of the Act and raised a tax demand of Rs. 1,63,11,275/- and interest of Rs. 1,23,96,569/- U/s. 201(1A) of the Act for the AY 2017-18 vide order dated 19/01/2024. 7. Being aggrieved by the above order, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order considering

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

149 ITR 29 (Delhi); CIT v. Mangtu Ram Jaipuria(1991) 192 ITR 533 (Cal); CIT v., Joy Ice-Creams (Bangalore ) P. Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 894 (Karn.); CIT v. Markapakula Agamma (1987) 165 ITR 386 (AP); CIT v. Merchandisers P. Ltd. (1990) 182 ITR 107 (Ker.) In all these decisions, the several High Courts held that if the cost

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

149 ITR 29 (Delhi); CIT v. Mangtu Ram Jaipuria(1991) 192 ITR 533 (Cal); CIT v., Joy Ice-Creams (Bangalore ) P. Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 894 (Karn.); CIT v. Markapakula Agamma (1987) 165 ITR 386 (AP); CIT v. Merchandisers P. Ltd. (1990) 182 ITR 107 (Ker.) In all these decisions, the several High Courts held that if the cost

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

149 ITR 29 (Delhi); CIT v. Mangtu Ram Jaipuria(1991) 192 ITR 533 (Cal); CIT v., Joy Ice-Creams (Bangalore ) P. Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 894 (Karn.); CIT v. Markapakula Agamma (1987) 165 ITR 386 (AP); CIT v. Merchandisers P. Ltd. (1990) 182 ITR 107 (Ker.) In all these decisions, the several High Courts held that if the cost

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

149 ITR 29 (Delhi); CIT v. Mangtu Ram Jaipuria(1991) 192 ITR 533 (Cal); CIT v., Joy Ice-Creams (Bangalore ) P. Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 894 (Karn.); CIT v. Markapakula Agamma (1987) 165 ITR 386 (AP); CIT v. Merchandisers P. Ltd. (1990) 182 ITR 107 (Ker.) In all these decisions, the several High Courts held that if the cost