BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

93 results for “TDS”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai553Delhi317Bangalore233Hyderabad108Ahmedabad103Raipur102Cochin93Chennai89Jaipur84Pune83Kolkata68Chandigarh40Lucknow39Indore29Visakhapatnam28Surat27Patna25Jodhpur20Rajkot18Nagpur15Jabalpur14Amritsar14Cuttack10Agra9Panaji6SC5Guwahati5Allahabad4Ranchi3Dehradun2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153C127Section 250116Section 15342Addition to Income28Section 142(1)24Section 13223Search & Seizure23Undisclosed Income23Limitation/Time-bar16Section 263

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 917/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

section 3 of the Taxation Laws (Continuation and Validation of Recovery Proceedings) Act, 1964 (11 of 1964).’ (emphasis, ours) Whether the said provision, inapplicable in the instant case inasmuch as the notices of demand stand issued much prior to 01/10/2014, would save the same is to be seen. The Hon’ble Court was, however, unanimous in that a set aside

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,ERNAKULAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

Showing 1–20 of 93 · Page 1 of 5

10
Section 145(3)10
Section 1479

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 916/COCH/2022[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

section 3 of the Taxation Laws (Continuation and Validation of Recovery Proceedings) Act, 1964 (11 of 1964).’ (emphasis, ours) Whether the said provision, inapplicable in the instant case inasmuch as the notices of demand stand issued much prior to 01/10/2014, would save the same is to be seen. The Hon’ble Court was, however, unanimous in that a set aside

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 918/COCH/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

section 3 of the Taxation Laws (Continuation and Validation of Recovery Proceedings) Act, 1964 (11 of 1964).’ (emphasis, ours) Whether the said provision, inapplicable in the instant case inasmuch as the notices of demand stand issued much prior to 01/10/2014, would save the same is to be seen. The Hon’ble Court was, however, unanimous in that a set aside

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 919/COCH/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

section 3 of the Taxation Laws (Continuation and Validation of Recovery Proceedings) Act, 1964 (11 of 1964).’ (emphasis, ours) Whether the said provision, inapplicable in the instant case inasmuch as the notices of demand stand issued much prior to 01/10/2014, would save the same is to be seen. The Hon’ble Court was, however, unanimous in that a set aside

A & B ASSOCIATES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 643/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by directing the AO to -

For Appellant: Shri Lokanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Sr. D/R
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

section 144 of the Act, date of order 29/03/2024. 2 A&B Associates 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee firm, M/s A & B Associates was a non-filer and the Assessing Officer received information under ‘Non-filer Monitoring System’ (NMS) flagged in accordance with the Risk Management Strategy formulated by the Central Board of Direct

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TEHCNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 350/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter, in respect of assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, respectively. 2 ITA Nos.348/Coch/2024&Ors. Centre of Science &Technology for Rural Development. 2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 361/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter, in respect of assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, respectively. 2 ITA Nos.348/Coch/2024&Ors. Centre of Science &Technology for Rural Development. 2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 360/COCH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter, in respect of assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, respectively. 2 ITA Nos.348/Coch/2024&Ors. Centre of Science &Technology for Rural Development. 2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 348/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter, in respect of assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, respectively. 2 ITA Nos.348/Coch/2024&Ors. Centre of Science &Technology for Rural Development. 2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake

CENTRE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 349/COCH/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Vipin K, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act” hereinafter, in respect of assessment years 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, respectively. 2 ITA Nos.348/Coch/2024&Ors. Centre of Science &Technology for Rural Development. 2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake

BHARATH RASIKLAL SHAH,COCHIN vs. PCIT KOCHI-1, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 744/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Advocate &
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 194ASection 263Section 263(1)

TDS deducted and paid by the Appellant to the income tax department supported by the Exhibit P23 which is speaking evidence of the compliance followed by the Appellant. Hence, the order of the NFAC or the first assessment u/s 143(3) are not erroneous as contemplated in Section 263. G. The Appellant apprehends that reassessment based on Section 263 order

KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 223/COCH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith P.J., CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 139Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 154Section 239Section 80A

144 of the Act at Nil income accepting the claim for exemption u/s. 10(23AAA) of the Act. However, the appellant had filed an appeal before the CIT(A) contesting that the appellant was not granted credit for TDS of Rs. 6,07,52,715/- claimed as refund. 3. After receiving the assessment order the appellant filed a petition

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK,THRISSUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 284/COCH/2024[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2025AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoshri Sandeep Singh Karhailthe South Indian Bank Limited, Head Office, Mission Quarters, Tb Road, Thrissur Kerala - 680001 ............... Appellant Pan : Aabct0022F V/S Dcit, Circle – 1(1) & Tps ……………… Respondent Thrissur, Kerala

For Appellant: Shri Naresh C, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234BSection 234DSection 250

TDS amounts to Rs. 5,05,82,900/-. 3. Interest u/s.234B amounting to Rs. 5,81,36,331/ - only has been levied in the ordergenerated by the system.Interest u/s.234B amounting toRs.5,81,13,891/- only has been levied in the manual tax calculation sheet enclosed with the order. As per our working, interest u/s.234B amounts to Rs.5

ABC BUILDWARE INDIA (P) LIMITED,PARIYARAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 531/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 502/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI(PARTNER) ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 530/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming

ABDUL GAFOOR MUHAMMED POTTICHI,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 514/COCH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, which apply in cases of discrepancies in the books of accounts, were not invoked in this case. Therefore, we set aside the findings of the learned CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by him. Consequently, the assessee’s ground of appeal is hereby allowed. 56. Coming