THE ITO (TDS), KOTTAYAM vs. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

10A)(ii) and 10(10AA)(ii) of the Act. The Assessing Officer rejected the arguments of the assessee that the assessee is covered under the definition of “State”. According to the Ld. AR, section 192(2A) of the Income Tax Act, for TDS

THE ITO (TDS), KOTTAYAM vs. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

10A)(ii) and 10(10AA)(ii) of the Act. The Assessing Officer rejected the arguments of the assessee that the assessee is covered under the definition of “State”. According to the Ld. AR, section 192(2A) of the Income Tax Act, for TDS

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

TDS with the Government. 27. A proviso which is inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the provision workable, a proviso which supplies an obvious omission in the Section, is required to be read into the Section to give the Section a reasonable interpretation and requires to be treated as retrospective in operation so that a reasonable interpretation

M/S.US TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal for assessment year 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

TDS with the Government. 27. A proviso which is inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the provision workable, a proviso which supplies an obvious omission in the Section, is required to be read into the Section to give the Section a reasonable interpretation and requires to be treated as retrospective in operation so that a reasonable interpretation