BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

393 results for “TDS”+ Section 10(10)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,868Delhi2,867Bangalore1,317Chennai932Kolkata715Ahmedabad517Pune498Hyderabad414Cochin393Chandigarh337Jaipur324Raipur251Indore246Karnataka230Visakhapatnam139Surat119Cuttack114Nagpur94Rajkot94Lucknow87Jodhpur50Guwahati45Amritsar45Ranchi44Dehradun44Jabalpur36Patna36Agra35Telangana32Panaji28Allahabad18SC18Kerala12Varanasi11Himachal Pradesh7Calcutta7Rajasthan5Uttarakhand3Orissa3Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 25063TDS33Addition to Income27Section 4023Section 201(1)19Limitation/Time-bar17Section 143(3)15Section 234E14Section 26312Section 10

THE ITO (TDS), KOTTAYAM vs. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM

ITA 555/COCH/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10Section 10(10)(iii)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

iii), 10(10A)(ii) and 10(10AA)(ii) of the Act. The Assessing Officer rejected the arguments of the assessee that the assessee is covered under the definition of “State”. According to the Ld. AR, section 192(2A) of the Income Tax Act, for TDS

THE ITO (TDS), KOTTAYAM vs. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM

ITA 556/COCH/2018[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin

Showing 1–20 of 393 · Page 1 of 20

...
11
Condonation of Delay11
Section 200A10
14 May 2019
AY 2017-18

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10Section 10(10)(iii)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)

iii), 10(10A)(ii) and 10(10AA)(ii) of the Act. The Assessing Officer rejected the arguments of the assessee that the assessee is covered under the definition of “State”. According to the Ld. AR, section 192(2A) of the Income Tax Act, for TDS

THE ITO, WARD-2(1), TVM, TVM vs. SMT.G.S.LEKHA, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed and the Cross

ITA 194/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.194/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13

Section 10(37)Section 2(14)(iii)

TDS) (187 Taxman 1). Thus, he brought to tax a sum of Rs.1,65,31,119/- as long term capital gain. 4. On appeal, the CIT(A) observed that section 10 of the Act provides for income which cannot be included in the total income. Section 10(37) of the Act provides for exclusion from total income, capital

LAXMI MEGHAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KANHANGAD vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, KANNUR, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 656/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year :2012-13 M/S. Laxmi Meghan Educational Trust, Ito (Exemptions), Vs. Kmc W1/1504, Surgicare Centre & Hospital, Kannur – 670 006. Kasargode District, Kerala. Pan :Aaatl8244M Assessee Respondent

For Appellant: Shri. Anil D Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 10Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40

sections 12AA and 10(23C) (vi). 3. The Id. CIT(A) has grievously erred in rejecting the prayer u/s. 10(23C) (iii ad) stating that " There are no documents on record to show that during the financial year under consideration, the assessee trust existed solely for educational propose and not for purposes of profit and that the aggregate

M/S.MALAYALAM COMMUNICATION LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 403/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS u/s 194J or u/s 194C - Nature of agreement - AO was of the view that the "dubbing expenses/print processing fees" and "production expenses" were in the nature of 'fees for technical services' and 'royalty' respectively, and hence the tax should have been deducted under section 194J of the Act @10%,instead of @2% deducted by the assessee under section

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD,COCHIN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 01.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35Section 43(1)Section 92C

iii. Disallowance of pre-operative expenditure details of which were extracted by the AO vide para 9 of the draft assessment order. These pre-operative expenditure was incurred for the purpose of setting up of new plant at Chennai. In the books of account, the appellant company had capitalised the pre- operative expenditure. However, in the return of income

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 610/COCH/2010[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 609/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 611/COCH/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 606/COCH/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 615/COCH/2010[09-Aug]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 607/COCH/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 612/COCH/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 613/COCH/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 608/COCH/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

M/S JEEVAN TELECASTING CORPN LTD,COCHIN vs. ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, ITA Nos.606 to 610/Coch/2010 are partly allowed and ITA Nos

ITA 614/COCH/2010[007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Iype John, CAFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

10 of the Paper Book, reference is made to Circular No.275/201/95-IT (B) dated 29- 01-1997. As per the extract from the said circular referred to by the Hon. Supreme Court, "No demand visualized under section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act should be enforced after the Tax deductor has satisfied the Officer in charge of TDS, that

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,EDARIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) (TDS) KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 209/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jun 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith P.J., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 192Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 80C

iii) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192783(1) dated 31.08.2021 iv) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192880(1) dated 31.08.2021 v) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192737(1) dated 31.08.2021 vi) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035159401(1) dated 28.08.2021 2. Since the issues raised by the assessee in ITA No. 211/Coch/2021 for AY 2015-16 covers all the years grounds taken by the assessee, for the ITA Nos. 207 to 212/Coch/2021 2 M/s. Edarikode Service

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MALAPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 207/COCH/2021[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jun 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith P.J., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 192Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 80C

iii) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192783(1) dated 31.08.2021 iv) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192880(1) dated 31.08.2021 v) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192737(1) dated 31.08.2021 vi) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035159401(1) dated 28.08.2021 2. Since the issues raised by the assessee in ITA No. 211/Coch/2021 for AY 2015-16 covers all the years grounds taken by the assessee, for the ITA Nos. 207 to 212/Coch/2021 2 M/s. Edarikode Service

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,EDARIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) (TDS) KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 211/COCH/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jun 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith P.J., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 192Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 80C

iii) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192783(1) dated 31.08.2021 iv) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192880(1) dated 31.08.2021 v) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192737(1) dated 31.08.2021 vi) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035159401(1) dated 28.08.2021 2. Since the issues raised by the assessee in ITA No. 211/Coch/2021 for AY 2015-16 covers all the years grounds taken by the assessee, for the ITA Nos. 207 to 212/Coch/2021 2 M/s. Edarikode Service

EDARIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,EDARIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) (TDS) KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 210/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jun 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith P.J., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 192Section 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 80C

iii) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192783(1) dated 31.08.2021 iv) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192880(1) dated 31.08.2021 v) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035192737(1) dated 31.08.2021 vi) No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021-22/1035159401(1) dated 28.08.2021 2. Since the issues raised by the assessee in ITA No. 211/Coch/2021 for AY 2015-16 covers all the years grounds taken by the assessee, for the ITA Nos. 207 to 212/Coch/2021 2 M/s. Edarikode Service