BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,021Mumbai794Chennai353Bangalore282Kolkata146Karnataka120Ahmedabad98Jaipur45Chandigarh31Raipur30Hyderabad26Indore26Visakhapatnam19Dehradun19Rajkot17Lucknow13Pune12Nagpur8Cochin8Guwahati7Cuttack7Panaji6Amritsar6SC5Telangana5Jodhpur5Agra4Varanasi4Jabalpur3Surat3Uttarakhand2Patna1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 19513Section 9(1)(vii)12TDS8Section 234E5Section 5(2)(b)4Section 404Section 14A4Permanent Establishment4Deduction4Addition to Income

M/S SAFA ENTERPRISES ,KODUNGALLUR vs. THE ACIT , RANGE 2 , THRISSUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 231/COCH/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: ------- None ------For Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 40Section 5(2)(b)

TDS on the payment against the services of M/s. Grecal Ltd. In his submission, the appellant relied on Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000. It is critical to remind the appellant that the aforementioned circular was withdrawn on October 23, 2009, and since the appellant had already made the payment amounting to Rs. 8,08,886/- to M/s Grecal

4
Section 2013
Section 9(1)(i)3

M/S SAFA ENTERPRISES ,KODUNGALLUR vs. THE ACIT , RANGE 2 ,CIRCLE 1, THRISSUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 232/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: ------- None ------For Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 40Section 5(2)(b)

TDS on the payment against the services of M/s. Grecal Ltd. In his submission, the appellant relied on Circular No. 786, dated February 7, 2000. It is critical to remind the appellant that the aforementioned circular was withdrawn on October 23, 2009, and since the appellant had already made the payment amounting to Rs. 8,08,886/- to M/s Grecal

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 721/COCH/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Sept 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Gopi K, CAFor Respondent: Shri Omanakuttan, Snr. AR
Section 195Section 201Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

establishing an international airport at Cochin and in the said airport, the assessee was operating a duty free shop. The assessee for the purpose of procuring the merchandise for the duty free shop run by them, had entered into an agreement with M/s. Alpha Airport Holding Ltd., UK and Kreol Trading EST, UAE on 10/11/2000. The AO had issued

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 723/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Sept 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Gopi K, CAFor Respondent: Shri Omanakuttan, Snr. AR
Section 195Section 201Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

establishing an international airport at Cochin and in the said airport, the assessee was operating a duty free shop. The assessee for the purpose of procuring the merchandise for the duty free shop run by them, had entered into an agreement with M/s. Alpha Airport Holding Ltd., UK and Kreol Trading EST, UAE on 10/11/2000. The AO had issued

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 724/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Sept 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Gopi K, CAFor Respondent: Shri Omanakuttan, Snr. AR
Section 195Section 201Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

establishing an international airport at Cochin and in the said airport, the assessee was operating a duty free shop. The assessee for the purpose of procuring the merchandise for the duty free shop run by them, had entered into an agreement with M/s. Alpha Airport Holding Ltd., UK and Kreol Trading EST, UAE on 10/11/2000. The AO had issued

INDIA GATEWAY TERMINAL PRIVATE LIMITED ,ICTT, VALLARPADAM vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CIRCLE 1(2), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 546/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Ms. Remya S. Menon, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 195Section 40

TDS amount in respect of the above sum. The AO also made a disallowance of Rs. 42,58,027/- u/s. 14A of the Act. 3. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), challenging the above additions made on the ground that in respect of payment of Rs. 2,93,59,617/- there was no liability to deduction

INDIA GATEWAY TERMINAL PRIVATE LIMITED,ICTT, VALLARPADAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(2), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 545/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Feb 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Ms. Remya S. Menon, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 195Section 40

TDS amount in respect of the above sum. The AO also made a disallowance of Rs. 42,58,027/- u/s. 14A of the Act. 3. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), challenging the above additions made on the ground that in respect of payment of Rs. 2,93,59,617/- there was no liability to deduction

DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ACIT, CPC TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 220/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Sept 2022AY 2014-2015
For Appellant: None
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

permanent staff looking after administrative matters of the assessee the new appointees who frequently change are unable to keep track of various important tasks of the assessee. 2. There is no deliberate inaction or negligence on the part of the assessee and the fact that the assessee had been electronically filing TDS returns for subsequent quarters and accessing details