BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

209 results for “TDS”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai996Pune711Mumbai650Patna614Delhi601Bangalore491Hyderabad368Kolkata293Nagpur262Raipur212Cochin209Jaipur200Chandigarh160Ahmedabad145Visakhapatnam116Cuttack103Lucknow73Surat63Karnataka54Indore52Rajkot35Amritsar34Dehradun25Jodhpur24Kerala23Allahabad19Guwahati18Panaji16Agra15Ranchi11Jabalpur10Varanasi9SC7Telangana2Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 234E112TDS97Condonation of Delay59Section 20037Section 200A34Section 19234Section 201(1)33Section 206C33Section 194A26Limitation/Time-bar

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 761/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

TDS), Kozhikode ......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Richard Mathews, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 07.11.2025 O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: These four appeals by the assessee are filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 764/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin

Showing 1–20 of 209 · Page 1 of 11

...
21
Section 4020
Deduction19
07 Nov 2025
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

TDS), Kozhikode ......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Richard Mathews, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 07.11.2025 O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: These four appeals by the assessee are filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO ,WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 762/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

TDS), Kozhikode ......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Richard Mathews, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 07.11.2025 O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: These four appeals by the assessee are filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANAGALAM KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO,WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 763/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

TDS), Kozhikode ......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Richard Mathews, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 06.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 07.11.2025 O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: These four appeals by the assessee are filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi

CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD(KURIANNOOR BRANCH), KUMBANAD P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO (TDS), ALAPPUZHA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as

ITA 280/COCH/2019[2013-14 (27Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Jul 2019

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 200ASection 234E

condoned the delay rather than dismissing the appeals on delay. 4.4 On the merits of the issue involved, it was submitted that the officer handling the TDS

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD(THUMPAMON BRANCH),PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 527/COCH/2019[2013-14(27Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling the TDS

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD(THUMPAMON BRANCH),PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 526/COCH/2019[2013-14(26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling the TDS

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD(THUMPAMON BRANCH),PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 525/COCH/2019[2013-14(24 Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Oct 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling the TDS

SABIR ALI,KANNUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 202/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Cochin20 May 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.R Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

delay cannot be condoned and also on merits that the ACIT (CPC) TDS was justified in levying fees u/s 234E

SABIR ALI,KANNUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 201/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Cochin20 May 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.R Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

delay cannot be condoned and also on merits that the ACIT (CPC) TDS was justified in levying fees u/s 234E

SABIR ALI,KANNUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 200/COCH/2021[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Cochin20 May 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.R Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

delay cannot be condoned and also on merits that the ACIT (CPC) TDS was justified in levying fees u/s 234E

SABIR ALI,KANNUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 203/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: HeardITAT Cochin20 May 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.R Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

delay cannot be condoned and also on merits that the ACIT (CPC) TDS was justified in levying fees u/s 234E

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),KILIKOLLUR BRANCH vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 548/COCH/2019[2014-15(26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),KUNDARA BRANCH ,TVM vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 552/COCH/2019[2013-14(27Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),PUTHIYAKAVU BRANCH ,TVM vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 554/COCH/2019[2014-15(26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),KUNDARA BRANCH ,TVM vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 550/COCH/2019[2015-16(24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),KILIKOLLUR BRANCH vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 549/COCH/2019[2013-14 (27Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),KUNDARA BRANCH ,TVM vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 551/COCH/2019[2013-14(26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CATH KILIKOLLUR BRANCH OLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD(THUMPAMON BRANCH),TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ACIT(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 546/COCH/2019[2013-14(24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling

CSB BANK LTD (FORMERLY THE CAHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD),KILIKOLLUR BRANCH vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 547/COCH/2019[2013-14(24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2019

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

condoning the delay in filing the appeals, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. None was present on behalf of the assessee, however, we proceed to dispose of the case after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. The reasons for the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority is explained by stating that the Officer handling