BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

127 results for “TDS”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,800Delhi832Kolkata540Chennai316Ahmedabad303Bangalore291Pune222Chandigarh198Hyderabad146Cochin127Raipur126Jaipur104Cuttack96Visakhapatnam84Rajkot71Nagpur70Indore61Surat61Amritsar46Ranchi40Lucknow40Guwahati23Patna17Varanasi11Jodhpur10Panaji10Allahabad8Karnataka7SC5Jabalpur5Dehradun3Kerala1Telangana1Calcutta1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 25078Addition to Income26TDS26Section 201(1)24Condonation of Delay24Section 2(24)(vi)8Section 488Capital Gains8Section 143(3)6Section 194

THE ITO,, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.EXTRAWEAVE P. LTD, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 448/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahum/S. Extraweave Pvt. Ltd. Arattukulangara Complex 264B/Cmc 1 Vs. A.N. Puram, Alapuzha 688011 Sakteeswara Junction Cherthala 688524 Pan – Aabce5438L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 10BSection 10B(3)Section 143(2)Section 195Section 195(6)Section 40

loss of Rs. 3,36,17,037/- carried forward from previous years. 6. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of M/s. 3 M/s. Extraweave Pvt. Ltd. Patspin India Limited (245 CTR 97 (Ker.) has held that the business profit is to be computed necessarily after setting off unabsorbed depreciation carried forward from previous years. For these

Showing 1–20 of 127 · Page 1 of 7

6
Disallowance6
Depreciation5

BHIMA JEWELLERS,SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD vs. THE PR CIT, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 208/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.208/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Bhima Jewellers, Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income- 6/785 Ai, Tax, Kozhikode. Mysore Road, Chungum Junction, Sulthan Bathery, Wayanad-673 592. [Pan: Aakfb 9817C] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Revenue By Shri Dhanaraj A. Sr. Dr Assessee By Shri R. Krishnan, Ca Date Of Hearing 05/07/2018 Date Of Pronouncement 20/08/2018

Section 115BSection 14Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

forward business loss and unabsorbed depreciation. On the basis of this judgment unexplained cash credit of Rs.186,00,000/- is not eligible for set off of business loss of Rs.1,76,24,221/-. 3. On appeal, the CIT(A) observed that the Assessing Officer has not applied his mind to the issue, verified the facts and therefore, the order

M/S.KADUNA HOSPITALITY P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 500/COCH/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P. K. Bansal & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 145ASection 45Section 45(5)(b)Section 48

carried forward and set off against the gain assessable for AY 2013-14 (on account of grant of solatium and interest); 9. the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I was not justified, in not directing the Assessing Officer to grant set off of unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years under section 32(2), amounting to Rs.5,67,2047-, against

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 241/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

carried forward loss of Rs.5,21,57,391. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO vide order dated 27th March, 2015, passed u/s.143(3) of the Act at a total loss of Rs.1,79,04,252. While doing so, the AO made following disallowances:- Sr. Particulars Amount (Rs.) No. (i) Disallowance u/s.36

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 239/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

carried forward loss of Rs.5,21,57,391. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO vide order dated 27th March, 2015, passed u/s.143(3) of the Act at a total loss of Rs.1,79,04,252. While doing so, the AO made following disallowances:- Sr. Particulars Amount (Rs.) No. (i) Disallowance u/s.36

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 240/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

carried forward loss of Rs.5,21,57,391. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO vide order dated 27th March, 2015, passed u/s.143(3) of the Act at a total loss of Rs.1,79,04,252. While doing so, the AO made following disallowances:- Sr. Particulars Amount (Rs.) No. (i) Disallowance u/s.36

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS "JRG SECURITIES LTD"),KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 243/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

carried forward loss of Rs.5,21,57,391. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO vide order dated 27th March, 2015, passed u/s.143(3) of the Act at a total loss of Rs.1,79,04,252. While doing so, the AO made following disallowances:- Sr. Particulars Amount (Rs.) No. (i) Disallowance u/s.36

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 242/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

carried forward loss of Rs.5,21,57,391. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO vide order dated 27th March, 2015, passed u/s.143(3) of the Act at a total loss of Rs.1,79,04,252. While doing so, the AO made following disallowances:- Sr. Particulars Amount (Rs.) No. (i) Disallowance u/s.36

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

loss in the return.With regard to the denial of construction by the college authorities (Believers Church) it was evident from their Balance sheet as at 31/03/2010 that they had accounted the entire sum Rs.9.68 crores in A.Y.2010-11 and shown this amount as advance for work in progress in its I.T.A. Nos.27-35/Coch/2019, 54&55/Coch/2019, 208-213/Coch/2019, 238&239/Coch/2019, 207/Coch/2019