BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai81Delhi28Bangalore6Chennai5Indore5Jaipur3Guwahati2Kolkata2Visakhapatnam1Hyderabad1Jodhpur1Rajkot1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 4012Section 194H10Section 201(1)9Section 194C4Deduction4Addition to Income2TDS2Disallowance2

VNC STEEL DISTRIBUTORS,,KARUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), TRICHY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1937/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1937/Chny/2024 & Stay Petition No: 40/Chny/2024 [In Ita No: 1937/Chny/2024)] िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vnc Steel Distributors, Deputy Commissioner Of No.2, Industrial Estate, V. Income Tax, S. Vellalapatti, Circle -1(1), Karur – 639 004. Trichy. [Pan: Aadfv-9137-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Abhinov Vaidyanathan, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14.11.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinov Vaidyanathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT
Section 194CSection 194HSection 2Section 250Section 253(1)Section 30Section 40

price, business, training, etc.. Therefore, the contention of the assessee that dealer incentive scheme of the assessee are on principal-to principal basis, does not stand to the test of facts and clauses of the dealer appointment letters. In normal situation of principal-to principal relationship one cannot control the other. However, in the present case, the assessee exercises

GREENSTAR FERTILIZERS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT TDS CIRCLE, MADURAI

The appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 274/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.274/Chny/2023 (िनधाCरण वषC / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.275/Chny/2023 (िनधाCरण वषC / Assessment Year: 2019-20) M/S. Greenstar Fertilizers Limited, Acit बनाम Spic House, 7Th Floor, 88,Mount Road Tds Circle, / Vs. Guindy, Chennai-600 032. Madurai "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aadcg-9451-D (अपीलाथ&/Appellant) : ('(थ& / Respondent) अपीलाथ& की ओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld. Ar '(थ& की ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal(Jcit) –Ld.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-06-2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 27-06-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. The Grievance Of The Assessee In Captioned Appeals For Assessment Years (Ay) 2018-19 & 2019-20 Is Identical I.E., Demand Raised U/S 201(1) / (1A) For Want Of Tax Deduction At Source (Tds) On Certain Payments In Terms Of Sec. 194H Of The Act. These Payments Are In The Nature Of Rebates Given By The Assessee To Its Dealers / Distributors. The Impugned Orders Have Been Passed By Learned

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal(JCIT) –Ld.DR
Section 194HSection 201(1)

price fixed by the principal from time to time. 3. The Principal will pass on to the Distributor/ Dealer such trade margins, discounts or commissions currently in vogue and as modified periodically by the Principal to the Distributor/ Dealer. 4. The Distributor/ Dealer or their authorized agent shall ensure, during the currency of this agreement, to promote the distribution

GREENSTAR FERTILIZERS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT TDS CIRCLE, MADURAI

The appeals stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 275/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.274/Chny/2023 (िनधाCरण वषC / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.275/Chny/2023 (िनधाCरण वषC / Assessment Year: 2019-20) M/S. Greenstar Fertilizers Limited, Acit बनाम Spic House, 7Th Floor, 88,Mount Road Tds Circle, / Vs. Guindy, Chennai-600 032. Madurai "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aadcg-9451-D (अपीलाथ&/Appellant) : ('(थ& / Respondent) अपीलाथ& की ओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld. Ar '(थ& की ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal(Jcit) –Ld.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-06-2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 27-06-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. The Grievance Of The Assessee In Captioned Appeals For Assessment Years (Ay) 2018-19 & 2019-20 Is Identical I.E., Demand Raised U/S 201(1) / (1A) For Want Of Tax Deduction At Source (Tds) On Certain Payments In Terms Of Sec. 194H Of The Act. These Payments Are In The Nature Of Rebates Given By The Assessee To Its Dealers / Distributors. The Impugned Orders Have Been Passed By Learned

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal(JCIT) –Ld.DR
Section 194HSection 201(1)

price fixed by the principal from time to time. 3. The Principal will pass on to the Distributor/ Dealer such trade margins, discounts or commissions currently in vogue and as modified periodically by the Principal to the Distributor/ Dealer. 4. The Distributor/ Dealer or their authorized agent shall ensure, during the currency of this agreement, to promote the distribution

FUJI ELECTRIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 701/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. Siddhesh Chaugula, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. A R V Sreenivasan, C.I.T
Section 92C

transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.7,96,238/- is allowed. 9. The Assessee has created two provisions in the year end viz., 1) Provision for Installation and Authorised services: Rs.65,50,563/- and 2) Provision for Sales Commission: Rs.1,85,56,926/-. 10. In the Draft Assessment Order, the AO has disallowed the same on the ground that provision

VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 587/CHNY/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.587/Chny/2017 िनधा:रण वष: /Assessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Ketan K. Ved, C.A HIFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 153(2)Section 201(1)Section 40

price at which these are transferred to pre-paid distributors and discount in nature. A.O has made disallowances of discount extended by the assessee company to various distributors of prepaid SIM Card/Recharge coupon u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act on the ground that assessee was required to deduct TDS under section 194H