BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 167Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8Chennai4Karnataka1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 167B16Section 143(3)8Section 1474Section 1484Section 24Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income4

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL JOINT VENTURE,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORP CIR-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 17/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

section 167B only will be applicable in the appellant’s case. 3.4 The CIT (Appeals) has also failed to consider the submissions made by the Appellant with respect to the amounts transferred to the members of the AOP over the years, wherein also the determinate share of profits of the members of the AOP are clearly established. 4. The Appellant

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL JOINT VENTURE,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORP CIR-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 19/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

section 167B only will be applicable in the appellant’s case. 3.4 The CIT (Appeals) has also failed to consider the submissions made by the Appellant with respect to the amounts transferred to the members of the AOP over the years, wherein also the determinate share of profits of the members of the AOP are clearly established. 4. The Appellant

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL JOINT VENTURE,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORP CIR-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 18/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

section 167B only will be applicable in the appellant’s case. 3.4 The CIT (Appeals) has also failed to consider the submissions made by the Appellant with respect to the amounts transferred to the members of the AOP over the years, wherein also the determinate share of profits of the members of the AOP are clearly established. 4. The Appellant

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 1008/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

section 167B only will be applicable in the appellant’s case. 3.4 The CIT (Appeals) has also failed to consider the submissions made by the Appellant with respect to the amounts transferred to the members of the AOP over the years, wherein also the determinate share of profits of the members of the AOP are clearly established. 4. The Appellant