BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 115Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai106Delhi101Bangalore9Kolkata5Chennai5Pune5SC1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 14710Section 143(3)6Section 406Section 1485Section 9(1)(vi)5Section 144C4Section 1954Reopening of Assessment3Limitation/Time-bar

M/S REGEN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION GLOBAL LIMITED ,CHENNAI vs. ACIT , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE - 2 (1) , CHENNAI

The appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 684/CHNY/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Jul 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.684/Chny/2022 (िनधा;रण वष; / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.685/Chny/2022 (िनधा;रण वष; / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Regen Renewable Energy Acit बनाम Generation Global Limited International Taxation New No.1, Pulla Avenue, / Vs. Circle-2(1), Chennai. Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-600 030. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aafcr-0685-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri B. Ramakrishnan (Ca) – Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Mrs. Jyothi Lakshmi Nayak (Cit)-Ld. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03-06-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 10-07-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ()

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan (CA) – Ld.ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Jyothi Lakshmi Nayak (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 115A(1)(b)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 147
3
Section 144C(5)2
Double Taxation/DTAA2
Addition to Income2
Section 148
Section 153
Section 234B

section 115A(1)(b) of the Act. 3. Without prejudice to the above, for that the Learned Assessing Officer, having held the appellant as the 'beneficial owner' of the royalty received, ought to have held the resident Holding company responsible for failure to deduct the due tax at source on payments made to the appellant being a foreign company

M/S REGEN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION GLOBAL LIMITED ,CHENNAI vs. ACIT , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE - 2 (1) , CHENNAI

The appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 685/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Jul 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 1. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.684/Chny/2022 (िनधा;रण वष; / Assessment Year: 2014-15) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.685/Chny/2022 (िनधा;रण वष; / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Regen Renewable Energy Acit बनाम Generation Global Limited International Taxation New No.1, Pulla Avenue, / Vs. Circle-2(1), Chennai. Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-600 030. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aafcr-0685-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri B. Ramakrishnan (Ca) – Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Mrs. Jyothi Lakshmi Nayak (Cit)-Ld. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03-06-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 10-07-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ()

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan (CA) – Ld.ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Jyothi Lakshmi Nayak (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 115A(1)(b)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 234B

section 115A(1)(b) of the Act. 3. Without prejudice to the above, for that the Learned Assessing Officer, having held the appellant as the 'beneficial owner' of the royalty received, ought to have held the resident Holding company responsible for failure to deduct the due tax at source on payments made to the appellant being a foreign company

SAME DEUTZ FAHR ITALIA SPA,ITALY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 937/CHNY/2024[AY 2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jan 2025

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R.Raghunatha, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri. S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl. CIT
Section 147Section 148Section 250o

115A of the Act. Apart from the above, the assessee is also in receipt of an amount of Rs.1,99,03,858/- from India being re-imbursement towards warranty payments which was not offered to tax for the reason that the said amount was not chargeable to tax in India as (a) The cost incurred on account of warranty claim

M/S. SERVIONT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-6(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 756/CHNY/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 756/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2010 - 2011

For Appellant: Mr. S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer amounts to income deemed to accrue or arise in India. The Assessing Officer held that since the Assessee has not deducted tax as required u/s.195 of the Act, therefore the provisions of Section 40(a)(i) are attracted to disallow the said payment. 5. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessee submitted that the payment under reference

SERVIONT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 903/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 Servoint Global Solutions Deputy Commissioner Of Limited Income Tax, Central Circle- No. 4/600 & 4/197, 7Th 6(1), Chennai. Vs. Street, Dr. Vsi Estate, Phase-Ii, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041. Pan: Aaaci0947 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri S. P. Chidambaram, Ca Respondent By : Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 24.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-16, Chennai Vide Ita No. 257/Cit(A)-15/2014-15 Dated 01.01.2019 Against The Order Of Ld. Dcit, Corporate Circle-6(1), Chennai Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 92Ca(3) Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Act), Dated 23.02.2015 For Ay 2011-12. 2. The First Issue Involved In The Present Appeal Before Us Relates To Disallowance Of Payments Made Towards Purchase Of Software By The Assessee U/S. 40(A)(I) Of The Act Amounting To Rs.2,61,69,512/- For Non-Deduction Of Tax At Source U/S.195 Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Chidambaram, CAFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

transfer amounts to income deemed to accrue or arise in India. The Assessing Officer held that since the Assessee has not deducted tax as required u/s.195 of the Act, therefore the provisions of Section 40(a)(i) are attracted to disallow the said payment. 4. During the course of assessment proceedings, Assessee submitted that the payment under reference