K 720 T GANAPATHIPALAYAM PACS LIMITED,ERODE vs. ITO WARD 2(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

68,133/- from Erode Central Co-op Bank Ltd and\nclaimed deduction of same u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The Assessing\nOfficer disallowed the claim holding that a co-operative bank is urban\ncommercial bank and does not fall under the purview of co-operative\nsociety referred in section

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD,THIRUCHENGODE vs. CIT(A), SALEM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.,THIRUCHENGODE vs. ITO,WARD 5, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.,THIRUCHENGODE vs. ITO,WARD 5, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

M/S. KALLAKURICHI CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD.,KALLAKURICHI vs. ACIT, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.369/Chny/2019 & Ita Nos.409 & 410/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 V. M/S.Kallakurichi Co-Operative- The Asst. Commissioner- Sugar Mills Unit-Ii, Of Income Tax, Cs11, Kachirapalayam, Villupuram Circle, Kallakurichi, Villupuram. Villupuram. [Pan: Aaaak 0655 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the present case, the assessee has earned interest income of Rs.6,75,68

M/S. KALLAKURICHI CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD.,KALLAKURICHI vs. ACIT, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.369/Chny/2019 & Ita Nos.409 & 410/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 V. M/S.Kallakurichi Co-Operative- The Asst. Commissioner- Sugar Mills Unit-Ii, Of Income Tax, Cs11, Kachirapalayam, Villupuram Circle, Kallakurichi, Villupuram. Villupuram. [Pan: Aaaak 0655 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the present case, the assessee has earned interest income of Rs.6,75,68

M/S. KALLAKURICHI CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD.,KALLAKURICHI vs. ACIT, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.369/Chny/2019 & Ita Nos.409 & 410/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 V. M/S.Kallakurichi Co-Operative- The Asst. Commissioner- Sugar Mills Unit-Ii, Of Income Tax, Cs11, Kachirapalayam, Villupuram Circle, Kallakurichi, Villupuram. Villupuram. [Pan: Aaaak 0655 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the present case, the assessee has earned interest income of Rs.6,75,68

A KONDALAMPATTY PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,SALEM vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1016/Chny/2024 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2017-18 A Kondalampatty Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Operative Vs. Ward-1(1), Credit Society Ltd., Salem. Kondalampatty, Salem – 636 010. [Pan: Aabaa 7085R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) Hiथ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Arv Srinivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Jagadish, A.M : Aforesaid Appeal Filed By The Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18 Arises Out Of The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Hereinafter “Cit(A)”] Dated 23.02.2024 In The Matter Of Assessment Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S. 143(3) Of The Act On 24.12.2019. :- 2 -: 2. The Only Ground Of Appeal In This Appeal Is Against The Disallowance Of Claim Of Deduction U/S. 80P(4) Of The Act Of Rs.35,32,342/-. The Assessee Is The Primary Agricultural Co-Operative

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

THE COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON- CORPORATE WARD 12(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 619/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year : 2018-2019 The Commercial Employees Co- Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Operative Society Limited, Non Corp Ward 12(1) No.37C, Sembudoss Street, Chennai. George Town, Chennai 600 001. [Pan Aahat 3600M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. J. Prabhakar, C.A. अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओरसे /Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2023 आदेश/ O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh:

68 taxmann.com.298 (Kerala), the High Court considered similar substantial questions of law (Issue No.A) raised by the assessee, regarding the entitlement for exemption under sub section (4) of Section 80P. By considering the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural society, the Kerala High Court has answered the substantial question of law in favour

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1), CHENNAI vs. REPCO HOME FINANCE P LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA no

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ramit Kochar

80P ; (e) "housing finance company" means a public company formed or registered in India with the main object of carrying on the business of providing long-term finance for construction or purchase of houses in India for residential purposes ; (f) "public company" shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 3 of the Companies

ELUMALAIYAN POWERLOOM, WEAVERS COOP P & S SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1463/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Elumalaiyan Powerloom Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Weavers Co.Op P & S Society Ward 1(1), Limited Eh 216, Erode. No.285/1, Karuppannan Koil Street, Kumalan Kuttai, Erode – 638 011. [Pan: Aaaae 3164A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Ms. S. Sree Lakshmi Valli, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 21.02.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2024

2 25.09.2023 02.10.2023 Response submitted on 28.09.2023. I noted from the above that assessee submitted response on 28.09.2023 and the ld. CIT(A) decided the appeal on 18.10.2023. In my view, the ld. CIT(A) has not given proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee. I further note that Erode District Central Co-operative Bank is a Co-operative

ABAN SINGAPORE PTE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT INTL TAX 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.500/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2022-23 Aban Singapore Pte Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Room No.8713, Bsnl Building, Tax, 4Th Floor, Bsnl Towers, Intl Tax-1(1), No.16, Greams Road, Chennai. Chennai [Pan: Aaqca2845Q]

68[(g) any sum payable by the assessee to the Indian Railways for the use of railway assets, 69[or]] 70[(h) any sum payable by the assessee to a micro or small enterprise beyond the time limit specified in section 15 71 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (27 of 2006),] shall be allowed

KANGAYAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,KANGAYAM vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), , TIRUPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

2)(d). Therefore, the AO decision to disallow this income of Rs.5,14,418/- and subjecting it to tax as per section 56 is upheld The appellant’s appeal on this ground is dismissed.” Aggrieved, now assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. We have heard rival contentions and gone through facts and circumstances of the case

DK 140 UTHANGARAI PUESHES TEACHERS & EMP. CO-OP THRIFT & CREDIT SCOIETY LTD.,KRISHNAGIRI vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KRISHNAGIRI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1227/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Dk140 Uthangarai Pueshes Teachers Vs. The Income Tax Officer & Emp. Co-Op. Thrift & Credit Ward 1, Society Limited, 140, Uthangarai, Krishnagiri. Krishnagiri-635 001. [Pan:Aagad3195A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, F.C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Vijay Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 24.02.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For The Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Assessee Raised 6 Grounds Of Appeal Amongst Which, The Only Issue Emanates For Our Consideration As To Whether The Ld. Cit(A)

80P of the Act. The return filed by the assessee was selected 4 I.T.A. No.1227/Chny/25 for limited scrutiny and issued various statutory notices including show- cause notice as reflected at page 2 of the assessment order. However, there was no compliance from the assessee. Considering the details collected from the ITR, balance sheet, profit & loss account, Form 3CB (audit report

C-2573 DHAMALERIMUTHUR PACCS LTD.,TIRUPATTUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, VELLORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1035/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 C-2573 Dhamalerimuthur Paccs Ltd., Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 188/2, Dhamalerimuthur, Ward 1, Tirupattur, 635 853. Vellore. [Pan:Aabad1030D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Jainendar, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 01.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 18.03.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For The Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Assessee Raised 9 Grounds Of Appeal Amongst Which, The Only Issue Emanates For Our Consideration As To Whether The Ld. Cit(A) Is Justified In Confirming The Addition Made By The Assessing Officer Under 2

68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short] in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Brief facts relating to the case are that the assessee filed return of income declaring total income of ₹.0. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny through CASS and notice under section 143(2

DCIT, TRICHY vs. M/S. THE KARUR VYSYA BANK. LTD., KARUR

Accordingly, the claim of the assessee that it had to be allowed on actual payment basis was, in our opinion, rightly allowed by the CIT(Appeals)

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, the principle is equally applicable to all banks/commercial banks, to which Banking Regulation Act, 1949 applies. 4. In the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in the matter, the issue is well settled. Accordingly, the Board has decided that no appeals may henceforth be filed on this ground by the officers