BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai100Delhi29Rajkot22Ahmedabad17Indore14Hyderabad11Pune9Jaipur8Chennai6Bangalore6Nagpur4Kolkata4Jodhpur3Amritsar2Raipur1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 80P12Section 143(3)6Deduction6Section 271(1)(C)4Section 271(1)(c)4Section 564Section 574Exemption4Penalty4Disallowance

M/S MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, COMPANY WARD-IV(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2259/CHNY/2007[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 80I

68,79,782/- u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act in respect to project ITA Nos: 2259/Chny/2007 & 194/Chny/2008 Marvel Apoorva resulting thereby a net loss of Rs. 35,78,307/-. The assessee claimed before the AO that the project name Marvel Apoorva was a plot area of 2.7 acres and having sanctioned built up area as mentioned in para

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

4
Section 80I2
Rectification u/s 1542
ITA 194/CHNY/2008[2003-04]Status: Disposed
ITAT Chennai
29 Jun 2022
AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 80I

68,79,782/- u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act in respect to project ITA Nos: 2259/Chny/2007 & 194/Chny/2008 Marvel Apoorva resulting thereby a net loss of Rs. 35,78,307/-. The assessee claimed before the AO that the project name Marvel Apoorva was a plot area of 2.7 acres and having sanctioned built up area as mentioned in para

THE GOVT. TELE COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-11(1), CHENNAI

ITA 2741/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri M. Karunakaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)Section 56Section 57Section 80P

68-69/2016 dated 21/03/2017 wherein the Court confirmed the finding of the Tribunal holding that no penalty should have been levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for denial of deduction claimed under section 801B

THE GOVT. TELE COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-11(1),, CHENNAI

ITA 2742/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri M. Karunakaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)Section 56Section 57Section 80P

68-69/2016 dated 21/03/2017 wherein the Court confirmed the finding of the Tribunal holding that no penalty should have been levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for denial of deduction claimed under section 801B

THE GOVT. TELE COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-11(1), CHENNAI

ITA 2743/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri M. Karunakaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)Section 56Section 57Section 80P

68-69/2016 dated 21/03/2017 wherein the Court confirmed the finding of the Tribunal holding that no penalty should have been levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for denial of deduction claimed under section 801B

THE GOVT. TELE COMMUNICATION EMPOLOYEES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-11(1), CHENNAI

ITA 2740/CHNY/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member), SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri M. Karunakaran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)Section 56Section 57Section 80P

68-69/2016 dated 21/03/2017 wherein the Court confirmed the finding of the Tribunal holding that no penalty should have been levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for denial of deduction claimed under section 801B