BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 54Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai32Chandigarh12Delhi10Jaipur7Pune6Bangalore6Chennai5Telangana3Karnataka3Kolkata3Nagpur3SC2Surat2Ahmedabad1Amritsar1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 28Section 1476Section 104Reopening of Assessment3Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Section 1482

ITO, COIMBATORE vs. SHRI R.VENKATACHALAM, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the

ITA 2024/CHNY/1994[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Apr 2016AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. B. Nischal, JCIT
Section 147

Section 54E of the Act for exemption on long term capital gains if it is invested as prescribed therein. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the assessee has transferred the capital asset, the immovable property for a total consideration of `37,79,978/- on 17.04.1989, and the assessee claimed exemption of the entire capital gain of `36,68

R.VENKATACHALAM,CHENNAI vs. ITO, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the

ITA 1831/CHNY/1994[1990-91]Status: Disposed
ITAT Chennai
22 Apr 2016
AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. B. Nischal, JCIT
Section 147

Section 54E of the Act for exemption on long term capital gains if it is invested as prescribed therein. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the assessee has transferred the capital asset, the immovable property for a total consideration of `37,79,978/- on 17.04.1989, and the assessee claimed exemption of the entire capital gain of `36,68

ITO, COIMBATORE vs. SHRI R.VENKATACHALAM, COIMBATORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue and the

ITA 3171/CHNY/1992[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Apr 2016AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. B. Nischal, JCIT
Section 147

Section 54E of the Act for exemption on long term capital gains if it is invested as prescribed therein. The Ld. D.R. further submitted that the assessee has transferred the capital asset, the immovable property for a total consideration of `37,79,978/- on 17.04.1989, and the assessee claimed exemption of the entire capital gain of `36,68

ANTHIAH PANCRAS,TIRUVANNAMALAI vs. ITO WARD 1, THIRUVANNAMALAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for ay: 2008-09 shall

ITA 27/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2

68 of the 1961 Act cannot be invoked for cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee filed certificate from Panchayat office to support its contention. The assessee contended that he received Rs.1,91,50,575/- from buyers for sale of acre 25.36 and half cents of land at Velapadi Village which is evidenced by unregistered agreement of sale dated

ANTHIAH PANCRAS,TIRUVANNAMALAI vs. ITO WARD 1, THIRUVANNAMALAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for ay: 2008-09 shall

ITA 28/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2

68 of the 1961 Act cannot be invoked for cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee filed certificate from Panchayat office to support its contention. The assessee contended that he received Rs.1,91,50,575/- from buyers for sale of acre 25.36 and half cents of land at Velapadi Village which is evidenced by unregistered agreement of sale dated