DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY, INCOME TAX OFFICE, TRICHY vs. RAMASAMY SIVAPRAKASAM, KARUR

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

68,713/- which comprised of the alleged bogus purchases of Rs.2,22,77,459/-. It is not in dispute that, in any trading / manufacturing transaction, a sale / manufacture of an article is possible only when there is a corresponding purchase. We find that, before the AO, the complete quantitative details of opening stock, purchases, sales and closing stock were furnished

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX OFFICE, TRICHY vs. RAMASAMY SIVAPRAKASAM, KARUR

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

68,713/- which comprised of the alleged bogus purchases of Rs.2,22,77,459/-. It is not in dispute that, in any trading / manufacturing transaction, a sale / manufacture of an article is possible only when there is a corresponding purchase. We find that, before the AO, the complete quantitative details of opening stock, purchases, sales and closing stock were furnished

RENAULT NISSAN TECHNOLOGY& BUSINESS CENTRE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHIPURAM vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1), , CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.913 & 914/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Renault Nissan Technology & Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Business Centre India Private Limited, Income Tax, Corporate Circle 5(1), Tp2/1, Ascendas It Park, Natham Main Building, Aayakar Bhavan, Sub Post Office, Mahindra World City, No. 121, M.G. Road, Kanchipuram District, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. Tamil Nadu 603 004. [Pan:Aadcr7253E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Ashik Shah, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 24.04.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.04.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against Separate Orders Both Dated 23.06.2023 Passed By The Nfac [Cit(A)] For The Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively.

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act' for brevity), is directed against the order dated 16.11.2016 in ITA.No.1009/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, for the assessment year 2009 - 10. 7 I.T.A. Nos.913 & 914/Chny/23 2. The appeal was admitted on 05.06.2018, on the following substantial questions of law. “1. Whether

RENAULT NISSAN TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS CENTRE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHIPURAM vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.913 & 914/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Renault Nissan Technology & Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Business Centre India Private Limited, Income Tax, Corporate Circle 5(1), Tp2/1, Ascendas It Park, Natham Main Building, Aayakar Bhavan, Sub Post Office, Mahindra World City, No. 121, M.G. Road, Kanchipuram District, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. Tamil Nadu 603 004. [Pan:Aadcr7253E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Ashik Shah, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 24.04.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.04.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against Separate Orders Both Dated 23.06.2023 Passed By The Nfac [Cit(A)] For The Assessment Year 2010-11 & 2011-12 Respectively.

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the 'Act' for brevity), is directed against the order dated 16.11.2016 in ITA.No.1009/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, for the assessment year 2009 - 10. 7 I.T.A. Nos.913 & 914/Chny/23 2. The appeal was admitted on 05.06.2018, on the following substantial questions of law. “1. Whether

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SIVA VENTURES LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

68,493/- u/s 4O(a)(a) of the IT Act holding that the transaction is a colourable device to reduce the taxable income and otherwise also in the nature of interest expense liable to TDS. The appellant has submitted that a. Factoring is akin to bill discounting, under a new nomenclature. Banks and a financial institutions have specialized division

SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDINGS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

68,493/- u/s 4O(a)(a) of the IT Act holding that the transaction is a colourable device to reduce the taxable income and otherwise also in the nature of interest expense liable to TDS. The appellant has submitted that a. Factoring is akin to bill discounting, under a new nomenclature. Banks and a financial institutions have specialized division

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SIVA VENTURES LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

68,493/- u/s 4O(a)(a) of the IT Act holding that the transaction is a colourable device to reduce the taxable income and otherwise also in the nature of interest expense liable to TDS. The appellant has submitted that a. Factoring is akin to bill discounting, under a new nomenclature. Banks and a financial institutions have specialized division

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SIVA VENTURES LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

68,493/- u/s 4O(a)(a) of the IT Act holding that the transaction is a colourable device to reduce the taxable income and otherwise also in the nature of interest expense liable to TDS. The appellant has submitted that a. Factoring is akin to bill discounting, under a new nomenclature. Banks and a financial institutions have specialized division

M/S.REDINGTON DISTRIBUTORS PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT, INTL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

68,988 85,99,964 3,99,69,024 440,755 2013-14 49,10,65,170 43,73,89,

M/S.REDINGTON DISTRIBUTIONS PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT, INTLTAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

68,988 85,99,964 3,99,69,024 440,755 2013-14 49,10,65,170 43,73,89,

M/S.REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT,INTL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

68,988 85,99,964 3,99,69,024 440,755 2013-14 49,10,65,170 43,73,89,

M/S. REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT, INTL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

68,988 85,99,964 3,99,69,024 440,755 2013-14 49,10,65,170 43,73,89,

M/S.REDINGTON DISTRIBUTIONS PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT, INTLTAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

68,988 85,99,964 3,99,69,024 440,755 2013-14 49,10,65,170 43,73,89,

M/S. REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. ACIT , INTL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

68,988 85,99,964 3,99,69,024 440,755 2013-14 49,10,65,170 43,73,89,

A KONDALAMPATTY PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,SALEM vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1016/Chny/2024 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2017-18 A Kondalampatty Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Operative Vs. Ward-1(1), Credit Society Ltd., Salem. Kondalampatty, Salem – 636 010. [Pan: Aabaa 7085R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) Hiथ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Arv Srinivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Jagadish, A.M : Aforesaid Appeal Filed By The Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18 Arises Out Of The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Hereinafter “Cit(A)”] Dated 23.02.2024 In The Matter Of Assessment Framed By Ld. Assessing Officer [Ao] U/S. 143(3) Of The Act On 24.12.2019. :- 2 -: 2. The Only Ground Of Appeal In This Appeal Is Against The Disallowance Of Claim Of Deduction U/S. 80P(4) Of The Act Of Rs.35,32,342/-. The Assessee Is The Primary Agricultural Co-Operative

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in T.C.A. Nos. 735, 755 of 2014 and 460 of 2015 before this Court. By judgment dated 05.07.2016, the appeals were dismissed, on the following reasoning: 3. Sub-section (4) of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is extracted below : (4) The provisions of this section shall

THE COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON- CORPORATE WARD 12(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.Gआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 619/Chny/2023 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year : 2018-2019 The Commercial Employees Co- Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Operative Society Limited, Non Corp Ward 12(1) No.37C, Sembudoss Street, Chennai. George Town, Chennai 600 001. [Pan Aahat 3600M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. J. Prabhakar, C.A. अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओरसे /Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit. सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19.12.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2023 आदेश/ O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh:

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in T.C.A. Nos. 735, 755 of 2014 and 460 of 2015 before this Court. By judgment dated 05.07.2016, the appeals were dismissed, on the following reasoning: 13. Sub-section (4) of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is extracted below : :- 6 -: (4) The provisions of this section shall

THIRUCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL CO-OP.MARKETING SOCIETY LTD.,THIRUCHENGODE vs. ITO,WARD 5, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in T.C.A. Nos. 735, 755 of 2014 and 460 of 2015 before this Court. By judgment dated 05.07.2016, the appeals were dismissed, on the following reasoning: 3. Sub-section (4) of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is extracted below : (4) The provisions of this section shall

ITO WARD 5, NAMAKKAL vs. THE TIRHCHENGODE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2954, 2955 & 2956/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. The Tiruchengode Agricultural Producers Co- Ward-5, Vs. Operative Marketing Society Ltd., Namakkal – 637 001. No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:298, 299 & 300/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2009-10, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. The Tiruchengode The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Producers Co- Vs. Ward-5, Operative Marketing Society Namakkal – 637 001. Ltd., No.9, Katchery Street, Velur Road, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal – 637 211. Pan: Aaaat 2058C अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Y. Sridhar, Advocate राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 12.07.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in T.C.A. Nos. 735, 755 of 2014 and 460 of 2015 before this Court. By judgment dated 05.07.2016, the appeals were dismissed, on the following reasoning: 3. Sub-section (4) of Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is extracted below : (4) The provisions of this section shall