BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 1Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi29Mumbai10Telangana7Chennai7Hyderabad5Ahmedabad5Indore5Cuttack4Kolkata2Bangalore1Jodhpur1Karnataka1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 109Section 1488Section 10(23)6Section 13(3)6Section 143(3)4Short Term Capital Gains4Bogus/Accommodation Entry4Reopening of Assessment4Condonation of Delay

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2280/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 148

section 3 7(1) of the Income tax Act. • Link between the purchaser and the raising contractor: With regard to the AO’s observation that there is no direct link between the purchaser of ore and assessee company, we submit that owing to the nature of operation carried out by the contractor and as per the commercial arrangement with

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

4
Section 113
Exemption3
Deduction3

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2282/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 148

section 3 7(1) of the Income tax Act. • Link between the purchaser and the raising contractor: With regard to the AO’s observation that there is no direct link between the purchaser of ore and assessee company, we submit that owing to the nature of operation carried out by the contractor and as per the commercial arrangement with

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2283/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 148

section 3 7(1) of the Income tax Act. • Link between the purchaser and the raising contractor: With regard to the AO’s observation that there is no direct link between the purchaser of ore and assessee company, we submit that owing to the nature of operation carried out by the contractor and as per the commercial arrangement with

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2281/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, IRS, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 148

section 3 7(1) of the Income tax Act. • Link between the purchaser and the raising contractor: With regard to the AO’s observation that there is no direct link between the purchaser of ore and assessee company, we submit that owing to the nature of operation carried out by the contractor and as per the commercial arrangement with

DCIT, CHATRAPATTI vs. M/S. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA nos2092& 2093/Chny/2016

ITA 2244/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida, Advocate
Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 13(3)

sections 13(1) (c) & 13 (1) (d) for ay 2012-13 etc. :-3-: ITA Nos.2092, 2093, 2244 & 2245/Chny/2016 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) pleading, inter alia, that that the AO refused exemption without making any discussion on denial of exemption

DCIT, CHATRAPATTI vs. M/S. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA nos2092& 2093/Chny/2016

ITA 2245/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida, Advocate
Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 13(3)

sections 13(1) (c) & 13 (1) (d) for ay 2012-13 etc. :-3-: ITA Nos.2092, 2093, 2244 & 2245/Chny/2016 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) pleading, inter alia, that that the AO refused exemption without making any discussion on denial of exemption

M/S. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGG. TECHNOLOGY,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA nos2092& 2093/Chny/2016

ITA 2093/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. Saroj Kumar Parida, Advocate
Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 13(3)

sections 13(1) (c) & 13 (1) (d) for ay 2012-13 etc. :-3-: ITA Nos.2092, 2093, 2244 & 2245/Chny/2016 4. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) pleading, inter alia, that that the AO refused exemption without making any discussion on denial of exemption