BONDALAPATI SHIVAJI RAO,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1044/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Bondalapati Shivaji Rao, 121, Shankar Nagar, M.G. Road, Pammal, Chennai-600 075. [Pan: Aahpb 0083 D] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) The Dcit, Central Circle-1(2), Chennai. (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. The Dcit, Central Circle-1(2), Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1103/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 V. Shri Bondalapati Shivaji Rao, 121, Shankar Nagar, M.G. Road, Pammal, Chennai-600 075. [Pan: Aahpb 0083 D] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By : Shri B. Ramakrishnan, Fca Shri S. Dwarakesh, Ca Shri Shrenik Chordia, Ca Department By : Shri V. Nandakumar, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.09.2024 आदेश / Order Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Appeals Preferred By The Assessee & The Revenue Are Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 18, Chennai (Hereinafter In Short `The Ld.Cit(A)') Dated 26.07.2023 Passed For Assessment Year (Hereinafter In Short `Ay') 2019-20.

1 of Section 142 when the assessee has not stated the income properly. Section 153C begins with non obstante clause that notwithstanding anything contained in Section 139, Section 147, Section 148, Section 149, Section 151 & Section 153, the Assessing Officer will issue notice as per provisions of 153A. The intention

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI vs. SITARAM JEWELLERS, MADURAI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

1,23,76,930/-, and Rs.1,49,84,905/- made for the assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22, respectively (iii) Addition for Unexplained Expenditure of Unaccounted Cash Transactions 6.6.16 The appellant denies the addition for unexplained expenditure of unaccounted cash transactions based on entries in the "J-Pack" ledger maintained by M/s. MJPL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI vs. SITARAM JEWELLERS, MADURAI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

1,23,76,930/-, and Rs.1,49,84,905/- made for the assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, and 2021-22, respectively (iii) Addition for Unexplained Expenditure of Unaccounted Cash Transactions 6.6.16 The appellant denies the addition for unexplained expenditure of unaccounted cash transactions based on entries in the "J-Pack" ledger maintained by M/s. MJPL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SUBRAMANIAM KATHIRESAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for AY 2014-15 is dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

1) of the Act expressly provides that once the AO has received "money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable articles or thing or books of account or documents seized" from the Subramaniam Kathiresan :: 23 :: AO of the searched person, he would proceed to assess or reassess the income of the person to whom such assets/books belong in accordance with Section

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

1) of the Act. The Ld. AR further emphasized that, the statement(s) referred to by the AO was not recorded u/s 132(4) but u/s 131 of the Act and that a statement made u/s 131 of the Act cannot be equated with a statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. He submitted that, a statement

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

1) of the Act. The Ld. AR further emphasized that, the statement(s) referred to by the AO was not recorded u/s 132(4) but u/s 131 of the Act and that a statement made u/s 131 of the Act cannot be equated with a statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. He submitted that, a statement

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

1) of the Act. The Ld. AR further emphasized that, the statement(s) referred to by the AO was not recorded u/s 132(4) but u/s 131 of the Act and that a statement made u/s 131 of the Act cannot be equated with a statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. He submitted that, a statement

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

1) of the Act. The Ld. AR further emphasized that, the statement(s) referred to by the AO was not recorded u/s 132(4) but u/s 131 of the Act and that a statement made u/s 131 of the Act cannot be equated with a statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. He submitted that, a statement

ARVIND NANDAGOPAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-3(1),, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

1) of the Act. The Ld. AR further emphasized that, the statement(s) referred to by the AO was not recorded u/s 132(4) but u/s 131 of the Act and that a statement made u/s 131 of the Act cannot be equated with a statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. He submitted that, a statement

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. RAMANATHAN VISWANATHAN, CHENNAI

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

153C of the Act on 03.12.2018. 51. Though we find that the statement(s) dated 03.04.2017 & 10.04.2017 had been retracted and also subjected to cross-examination prior to the recording of satisfaction note by the AO, we however consider it prudent to once examine its contents as well. Having gone through these statements, it is seen that, Shri

R.VISWANATHAN,CHENNAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4),, CHENNAI

153C of the Act on\n03.12.2018.\n51. Though we find that the statement(s) dated 03.04.2017 &\n10.04.2017 had been retracted and also subjected to cross-examination\nprior to the recording of satisfaction note by the AO, we however consider\nit prudent to once examine its contents as well. Having gone through\nthese statements, it is seen that, Shri

R.VISWANATHAN,CHENNAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), CHENNAI

153C of the Act on\n03.12.2018.\n51. Though we find that the statement(s) dated 03.04.2017 &\n10.04.2017 had been retracted and also subjected to cross-examination\nprior to the recording of satisfaction note by the AO, we however consider\nit prudent to once examine its contents as well. Having gone through\nthese statements, it is seen that, Shri

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; :-13-: ITA Nos: 2569, 2570, 2571, 2573 to 2577/Chny/2025 (ii) in an assessment or reassessment made in respect of an assessment year under this section, the tax shall be chargeable at the rate or rates as applicable to such assessment year

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; :-13-: ITA Nos: 2569, 2570, 2571, 2573 to 2577/Chny/2025 (ii) in an assessment or reassessment made in respect of an assessment year under this section, the tax shall be chargeable at the rate or rates as applicable to such assessment year

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; :-13-: ITA Nos: 2569, 2570, 2571, 2573 to 2577/Chny/2025 (ii) in an assessment or reassessment made in respect of an assessment year under this section, the tax shall be chargeable at the rate or rates as applicable to such assessment year

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; :-13-: ITA Nos: 2569, 2570, 2571, 2573 to 2577/Chny/2025 (ii) in an assessment or reassessment made in respect of an assessment year under this section, the tax shall be chargeable at the rate or rates as applicable to such assessment year

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

153C, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to the assessment made under this section; :-13-: ITA Nos: 2569, 2570, 2571, 2573 to 2577/Chny/2025 (ii) in an assessment or reassessment made in respect of an assessment year under this section, the tax shall be chargeable at the rate or rates as applicable to such assessment year

A. JOTHIMANI,KOMARAPALAYAM vs. DCIT, SALEM

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 2174 To 2178/Mds/2013 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2002-03, 2003-04,2004-05,2005-06 & 2006-07 Smt. A. Jothimani, The Deputy Commissioner Of No.11-D-2, Sivasakthi Nagar, V. Income Tax, Bye-Pass Road, Central Circle, Komarapalayam Salem. Pan : Adopj2834Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2183/Mds/2013 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2001-02 The Deputy Commissioner Of Shri P. Anbazhagan Income Tax, V. No.11-D-2, Sivasakthi Nagar, Central Circle, Bye-Pass Road, Salem. Komarapalayam-638183 Pan : Aavpa7006J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 2172 & 2173/Mds/2013 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2005-06 & 2006-07 M/S. Anburaj Exports, The Deputy Commissioner Of No.11-D, Sivasakthi Nagar, V. Income Tax, Bye-Pass Road, Central Circle, Komarapalayam Salem. Pan : Adopj2834Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

1,50,000/- under Section 68 of the Act for the assessment year 2002-03. According to the Ld. Counsel, the assessee is a person other than the search person. The addition was admittedly made under Section 153C