BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

192 results for “section 68”+ Section 138clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi731Mumbai542Karnataka470Bangalore193Chennai192Jaipur151Ahmedabad148Kolkata127Cochin72Hyderabad58Calcutta53Surat52Indore51Chandigarh49Raipur44Telangana37Pune33Visakhapatnam32Nagpur31Lucknow24Amritsar19Rajkot16Cuttack13SC12Allahabad12Jodhpur10Patna9Rajasthan7Agra7Dehradun5Orissa3Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1Guwahati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 13234Addition to Income32Section 153A24Section 143(3)22Disallowance19Section 14818Bogus Purchases15Undisclosed Income14Penalty13Depreciation

M/S AADHI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 308/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 308/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 Aadhi Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., The Acit, No.1-130, Perambur Barracks V. Central Circle-3(1), Road, Pattalam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 112. Pan: Aanca 0382P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri B. Ramakrishnan, Fca Shri S. Neelakantan, Fca Shri Shrenik Chordia, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri S. Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2023

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri S. Senthil Kumaran, CIT
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 68

Section 90 of the Act and relevant DTAA provisions."; Concludes that assessee had satisfied all the ingredients of Sec. 68, remarks that merely because the investor had not filed its income tax returns, it does not make the entire transactions bogus or the said investor non-existent. "; Rejects CIT(A)'s action in upholding addition for assessee's failure

Showing 1–20 of 192 · Page 1 of 10

...
11
Section 115Q10
Section 2509

SMT. SHARMILA S. JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 432/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2360/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2595/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2593/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SMT. SHARMILA S. JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 431/CHNY/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2591/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2396/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2587/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2399/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2359/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2358/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2592/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2598/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2594/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2398/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2362/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2363/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

M/S. SHREE BATTERY HOUSE,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2596/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that

SMT. SHARMILA S. JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 433/CHNY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

138 days in all these appeals. As the assessee is able to explain the delay, hence we condone the delay and admit these appeals for adjudication. This decision will apply in all the appeals for condonation of delay. 3. First, let us take the following 8 appeals regarding quantum addition and where the assessees have raised the jurisdictional issue that