BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai83Delhi66Kolkata18Ahmedabad11Jaipur10Pune6Chennai5Bangalore4Rajkot3Nagpur2Surat1Guwahati1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 14A21Section 115J16Disallowance4Section 1473Section 103Capital Gains3Section 143(3)2Depreciation2

M/S. BAY FORGE PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CO, CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2329/CHNY/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Dec 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, C.I.T
Section 115Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147

68,022,333) (33,01,26,553) (262,104,220) 31.03.2002 17,227,557 2,100,599 Reversal (29,97,03,363) of prov. for doubtful 2,23,50,425 debts

MADRAS SUGARS LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, COIMBAOTRE

ITA 433/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Chennai
27 Sept 2023
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)

115J". 4. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to have considered the judgement in the case of Kavithalayaa Productions (P.) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax in the ITAT Chennai Bench 'B' (IT APPEAL NO. 58 (CHNY.) OF 2020), wherein it has held that "we are of the considered view that on this issue, the A0 cannot

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SICAL LOGISTICS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1695/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri Milind Madhukar, JCIT &For Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 10Section 14A

68 - - ITA 1695 to 1697 & CO 84/Mds/14 18.10 As far as the FCCBs received in the form of loan from abroad was utilized only for the purpose of purchase of capital assets as per the regulation of RBI. Such loan amount cannot be used for working capital requirements. This has been brought to the knowledge of AO during the course

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SICAL LOGISTICS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1696/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri Milind Madhukar, JCIT &For Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 10Section 14A

68 - - ITA 1695 to 1697 & CO 84/Mds/14 18.10 As far as the FCCBs received in the form of loan from abroad was utilized only for the purpose of purchase of capital assets as per the regulation of RBI. Such loan amount cannot be used for working capital requirements. This has been brought to the knowledge of AO during the course

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SICAL LOGISTICS LTD., CHENNAI

ITA 1697/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri Milind Madhukar, JCIT &For Respondent: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 10Section 14A

68 - - ITA 1695 to 1697 & CO 84/Mds/14 18.10 As far as the FCCBs received in the form of loan from abroad was utilized only for the purpose of purchase of capital assets as per the regulation of RBI. Such loan amount cannot be used for working capital requirements. This has been brought to the knowledge of AO during the course