BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 115Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi63Mumbai53Bangalore14Pune7Kolkata6Dehradun4Chandigarh3Hyderabad2Chennai2Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 44B4Section 403Section 9(1)(vi)3Section 143(1)2Section 143(1)(a)2Section 143(3)2Section 1952Deduction2Disallowance2

ABAN SINGAPORE PTE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT INTL TAX 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 500/CHNY/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Jun 2025AY 2022-2023

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.500/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2022-23 Aban Singapore Pte Limited Deputy Commissioner Of Income Room No.8713, Bsnl Building, Tax, 4Th Floor, Bsnl Towers, Intl Tax-1(1), No.16, Greams Road, Chennai. Chennai [Pan: Aaqca2845Q]

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Shri N.Rajakumar, Addl.CIT
Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 36Section 43BSection 44B

68[(g) any sum payable by the assessee to the Indian Railways for the use of railway assets, 69[or]] 70[(h) any sum payable by the assessee to a micro or small enterprise beyond the time limit specified in section 15 71 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (27 of 2006),] shall be allowed

SERVIONT GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 903/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2011-12 Servoint Global Solutions Deputy Commissioner Of Limited Income Tax, Central Circle- No. 4/600 & 4/197, 7Th 6(1), Chennai. Vs. Street, Dr. Vsi Estate, Phase-Ii, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041. Pan: Aaaci0947 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri S. P. Chidambaram, Ca Respondent By : Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 24.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-16, Chennai Vide Ita No. 257/Cit(A)-15/2014-15 Dated 01.01.2019 Against The Order Of Ld. Dcit, Corporate Circle-6(1), Chennai Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 92Ca(3) Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The Act), Dated 23.02.2015 For Ay 2011-12. 2. The First Issue Involved In The Present Appeal Before Us Relates To Disallowance Of Payments Made Towards Purchase Of Software By The Assessee U/S. 40(A)(I) Of The Act Amounting To Rs.2,61,69,512/- For Non-Deduction Of Tax At Source U/S.195 Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Chidambaram, CAFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

115A of the Act and since the deduction of tax at source was not done on the payment made, provisions of Section 40(a)(i) of the Act becomes applicable. Accordingly, the learned Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of deduction for the impugned payment. 5. Aggrieved, Assessee carried the matter before the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals