BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Kolkata13Ahmedabad9Indore5Bangalore5Pune4Jaipur3Delhi3Nagpur3Hyderabad2Chennai2

Key Topics

Section 115B5Section 143(3)4Section 14A4Section 2633Section 682Section 111A2Section 143(2)2Capital Gains2Short Term Capital Gains2

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY vs. M/S MANGAL & MANGAL, TRICHY

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 772/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 772/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Mangal & Mangal, Income Tax, V. 25, N.S.B. Road, Teppakulam, Central Circle -2, Trichy – 620 002. No. 44, Williams Road, [Pan: Aaifm-3378-B] Cantonment, Trichy – 620 001. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Dr. R. Mohan Reddy, Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.06.2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.09.2023

For Appellant: Dr. R. Mohan Reddy, CITFor Respondent: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 111ASection 115BSection 143(2)Section 68

111A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and expenses debited into profit and loss account for earning exempt income as per schedule BP of ITR is significantly lower when compared to investment made to earn exempt income. A notice u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act, was issued from time-to-time

INTEGRATED INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLP,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NON COP. WARD1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 366/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Guru Bashyam, CIT(DR)
Section 111ASection 115BSection 14Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

section 115BBDA of the Act, can PCIT revise the assessment order? For this assessee has raised various grounds which need not to be reproduced. 3. Brief facts are that the assessee filed its return of income for the AY 2017-18 electronically on 13.10.2017 and subsequently assessee’s case was selected for limited scrutiny assessment by issuing notice