Search: reassessment u/s 147

9 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 270Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur47 Mumbai35 Ahmedabad30 Rajkot28 Delhi27 Bangalore23 Pune21 Cochin18 Hyderabad17 Chandigarh13 Patna9 Chennai9 Nagpur8 Agra7 Guwahati7 Visakhapatnam7 Surat6 Lucknow6 Kolkata3 Raipur3 Dehradun2 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)12 Section 14812 Section 14711 Section 270A9 Section 2748 Addition to Income8 Penalty6 Section 133A5 Section 143(3)5

SRI KRISHA TRADERS,SIVAGANGAI vs. DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, MADURAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2223/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2223/Chny/2025 िनधा%रण वष% /Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Mr. N. Vijay Kumar, C.A *+For Respondent: Ms. Babitha, JCIT

Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 40A(3)

147 of the Act by making an addition u/s. 40A(3) of the Act and the relevant observations of the AO in this regard are extracted as under: “6. It was mentioned by the ass that he was into the business of purchase and sale of old tyres. During the year under consideration, assessee had made total sales of Rs.2

SRI KRISHA TRADERS,SIVAGANGAI vs. DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, MADURAI

SRI KRISHA TRADERS,SIVAGANGAI vs. DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, MADURAI

CHENNIAPPAN RAMADURAI,ERODE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, COIMBATORE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI vs. SITARAM JEWELLERS, MADURAI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI vs. SITARAM JEWELLERS, MADURAI

M/S. CITADINES OMR APARTHOTEL PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORP WARD 1(3), CHENNAI

SREE NAVALADIYAN FINANCE,SALEM vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM

SREE NAVALADIAN FINANCE,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO, SALEM

SREE NAVALADIYAN FINANCE,NAMAKKAL vs. DCIT, CENT CIRCLE, SALEM

SREENAVALADIAN FINANCE,SALEM vs. DCIT,CENTRALCIRCLE, SALEM