BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 244Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi40Mumbai37Allahabad16Chennai13Bangalore11Cochin9Ahmedabad7Chandigarh7Kolkata5Jaipur2Lucknow1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)14Section 244A12Section 14711Natural Justice10Section 2509Business Income9Double Taxation/DTAA9Section 2633Section 139

KELLER (M) SDN BHD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT INTL TAX 1(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1319/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1319/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-2019) Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Keller (M) Sdn Bhd, Income Tax, 7Th Floor, Centennial Square, International Taxation 1(2) No.6A, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. [Pan: Aagck 8014M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Ashik Shah, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri. Ashik Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 239Section 263
3
Section 113
Section 1483
Addition to Income3

Reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Act 4 31-Mar 23 Notice under section 148 of the Act 5 28-Apr 23 Income tax return filed in response to notice under section 148 09- June 22 (a) Notice under section 142(1) of the to 18 Oct Act dated 09-Jun-22 and 07-Oct-22 were 22 issued

THE MADRAS SEVA SADAN,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, EXEMPTION,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1246/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1246/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2022-23 The Madras Seva Sadan, The Assistant Commissioner Of No.7, Shenstone Park, Income Tax (Exemption), Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai. Chennai-600 031. [Pan: Aaatt2871J] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri R.Venkatanarayanan, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.08.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri R.Venkatanarayanan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.R.Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 139Section 140ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 155Section 199Section 206CSection 244A

reassessment are pending in respect of an assessee, in computing the period for determining the additional interest payable to such assessee under this sub-section, the period beginning from the date on which such refund is withheld by the Assessing Officer in accordance with and subject to provisions of sub-section (2) of section 245 and ending 4[with

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI, INCOME TAX vs. HINDUSTAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 611/CHNY/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Sept 2024AY 2009-10
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 3(1)

147 of the Act.\n8.\nPer contra, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted his arguments\nto the grounds raised in the appeal by the department.\n9.\nThis ground of revenue is ill-conceived there is no excess claim\nof expenditure, incorrect to say it was not matching with the audited\nbooks of accounts of the assessee. In this connection

ALTHI VENKATA NARENDRA RAJU,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1247/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Aug 2025AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 153(3)

147, on or before the\nexpiry of twelve months from the end of the month in which the assessment order in\nthe case of the firm is passed.\n(7) Where effect to any order, finding or direction referred to in sub-section (5) or sub-section\n(6) is to be given by the Assessing Officer, within the time

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1523/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 2Section 244ASection 250

244A\n(Rs.46,69,244).\n5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble\nCIT(A) erred in upholding the levy of tax @41.6% on interest on income tax\nrefund considering the same to be attributable to alleged PE in India without\nappreciating that the same is taxable @ 15% in terms

M/S. REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1519/CHNY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2011-12
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

244A\n(Rs.46,69,244).\n5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble\nCIT(A) erred in upholding the levy of tax @41.6% on interest on income tax\nrefund considering the same to be attributable to alleged PE in India without\nappreciating that the same is taxable @ 15% in terms

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

ITA 1524/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

244A\n(Rs.46,69,244).\n5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble\nCIT(A) erred in upholding the levy of tax @41.6% on interest on income tax\nrefund considering the same to be attributable to alleged PE in India without\nappreciating that the same is taxable @ 15% in terms

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1522/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

reassessment proceedings were concluded with an order dated\n25.11.2019, passed under Sections 143(3) read with 147 and 144C(13)\nof the Act. In this order, an addition of Rs.17,61,12,836/- was made\ntowards profits allegedly attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE)\nin India, resulting in a tax demand of Rs.20,82,31,507.\n\nProceedings under

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1520/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

reassessment proceedings were concluded with an order dated\n25.11.2019, passed under Sections 143(3) read with 147 and 144C(13)\nof the Act. In this order, an addition of Rs.17,61,12,836/- was made\ntowards profits allegedly attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE)\nin India, resulting in a tax demand of Rs.20,82,31,507.\nProceedings under MAP\nPage

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1526/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

reassessment proceedings were concluded with an order dated\n25.11.2019, passed under Sections 143(3) read with 147 and 144C(13)\nof the Act. In this order, an addition of Rs.17,61,12,836/- was made\ntowards profits allegedly attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE)\nin India, resulting in a tax demand of Rs.20,82,31,507.\nProceedings under MAP\nITA

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1525/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

244A\n(Rs.46,69,244).\n5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble\nCIT(A) erred in upholding the levy of tax @41.6% on interest on income tax\nrefund considering the same to be attributable to alleged PE in India without\nappreciating that the same is taxable @ 15% in terms

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1527/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2020-21
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

reassessment proceedings were concluded with an order dated\n25.11.2019, passed under Sections 143(3) read with 147 and 144C(13)\nof the Act. In this order, an addition of Rs.17,61,12,836/- was made\ntowards profits allegedly attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE)\nin India, resulting in a tax demand of Rs.20,82,31,507.\nProceedings under MAP\nWhile

REDINGTON DISTRIBUTION PTE LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, all the captioned appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 1521/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 244ASection 250

244A\n(Rs.46,69,244).\n5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble\nCIT(A) erred in upholding the levy of tax @41.6% on interest on income tax\nrefund considering the same to be attributable to alleged PE in India without\nappreciating that the same is taxable @ 15% in terms