BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 167Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai4Delhi2Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 167B16Section 143(3)8Section 1474Section 1484Section 24Reopening of Assessment4Addition to Income4

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL JOINT VENTURE,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORP CIR-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 17/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

147 is not valid. 2.1 The CIT (A) is not justified in concluding that the re-opening of assessment by issue of notice u/s 148 is valid 2.2 The CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the argument of Addl.CIT that merely because the Assessee makes submission to Assessing Officer does not automatically imply that an opinion is formed on the said

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL JOINT VENTURE,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORP CIR-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 18/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

147 is not valid. 2.1 The CIT (A) is not justified in concluding that the re-opening of assessment by issue of notice u/s 148 is valid 2.2 The CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the argument of Addl.CIT that merely because the Assessee makes submission to Assessing Officer does not automatically imply that an opinion is formed on the said

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL JOINT VENTURE,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NON CORP CIR-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 19/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

147 is not valid. 2.1 The CIT (A) is not justified in concluding that the re-opening of assessment by issue of notice u/s 148 is valid 2.2 The CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the argument of Addl.CIT that merely because the Assessee makes submission to Assessing Officer does not automatically imply that an opinion is formed on the said

HERVE POMERLEAU INTERNATIONAL CCCL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the ITA No

ITA 1008/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Oct 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate and Shri. K. Venkatraman, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 167BSection 2

147 is not valid. 2.1 The CIT (A) is not justified in concluding that the re-opening of assessment by issue of notice u/s 148 is valid 2.2 The CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the argument of Addl.CIT that merely because the Assessee makes submission to Assessing Officer does not automatically imply that an opinion is formed on the said