ACIT, MADURAI vs. ARUNA ALLOY STEELS PRIVATE LTD., MADURAI
In the result, the Revenue’s appeal for assessment year
ITA 933/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Apr 2017AY 2008-09
Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3, 933 & 847/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2007-08 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S Aruna Alloy Steels (P) Ltd., Income Tax, V. Super B-3, Industrial Estate, Corporate Circle I, K-Pudur, Madurai – 625 007. Madurai. Pan : Aaeca 6781 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)
For Appellant: Sh. Pathlavath Peerya, CITFor Respondent: Shri K. Ravi, Advocate
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147
u/s. 148 is hereby issued. ACIT
11.01.2010
10. From the above, it is obvious that the satisfaction was
recorded by the JCIT, Range-III, Madurai. In fact, the JCIT found
that he has reason to believe that income chargeable to tax
escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147 of the Act.
11. Now the question arises for consideration
