BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

339 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,160Mumbai888Chennai339Ahmedabad336Bangalore296Jaipur270Kolkata212Hyderabad176Pune150Chandigarh124Rajkot108Indore107Amritsar105Surat104Visakhapatnam77Raipur66Nagpur60Cochin43Guwahati40Patna40Agra37Lucknow28Jodhpur23Cuttack17Allahabad16Varanasi7Jabalpur5Panaji4Dehradun3Ranchi2Orissa2Karnataka1Gauhati1SC1

Key Topics

Section 148131Section 14769Addition to Income48Section 13242Section 143(3)38Section 153A33Reassessment28Section 1126Section 250

SMT. JAYANTHI SEEMAN,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 1 (2), , CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 770/CHNY/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2025AY 2010-11
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 69

147 of the Income\nTax Act, 1961, wherein the following additions were made for the\nΑ.Υ.2012-13:\nIncome admitted in Return of Income\nAdditions:\nUnexplained cash deposits u/s. 69\nExcess in capital account u/s. 69\nUnexplained investment u/s. 69\nInterest Receipt not admitted in ROI\nDisallowance of Rent payment\nUnexplained Fee Receipts\nIncome from Long Term Capital Gains

SMT. JAYANTHI SEEMAN,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 1 (2),, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 772/CHNY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai

Showing 1–20 of 339 · Page 1 of 17

...
24
Section 26323
Cash Deposit19
Limitation/Time-bar15
28 Feb 2025
AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 69

cash outflows.\nIt is further submitted by the Id.AR that the assessee's family owns\n77 acres of land consist of paddy and mango. These lands were\npurchased by the family in various years from 1988. Further, the\nassessee purchased additional 89 acres of land (thottam lands)\nduring the year 2012-13.\nThe Id.AR stated that the assessee

SMT. JAYANTHI SEEMAN,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 1 (2),, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 773/CHNY/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2025AY 2013-14
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 69

cash outflows.\nIt is further submitted by the Id.AR that the assessee's family owns\n77 acres of land consist of paddy and mango. These lands were\npurchased by the family in various years from 1988. Further, the\nassessee purchased additional 89 acres of land (thottam lands)\nduring the year 2012-13.\nThe Id.AR stated that the assessee

K.GURUMURTHY,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 11(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2922/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr.A.R.V.Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: 29.01.2020
Section 143(3)Section 147

reassessment proceedings conducted by AO u/s 147/148 of the 1961 Act for both the ay’s: 2011-12 & 2012-13, the assessee was asked to produce sources for cash deposits, confirmation for loan, details of interest paid and copy of bank statements. The AO in the meantime obtained bank statements directly from bank which were examined

K.GURUMURTHY,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 11(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2921/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Feb 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr.A.R.V.Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: 29.01.2020
Section 143(3)Section 147

reassessment proceedings conducted by AO u/s 147/148 of the 1961 Act for both the ay’s: 2011-12 & 2012-13, the assessee was asked to produce sources for cash deposits, confirmation for loan, details of interest paid and copy of bank statements. The AO in the meantime obtained bank statements directly from bank which were examined

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. SENTHIL PAPAIN & FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., COIMBATORE

ITA 465/CHNY/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. SENTHIL PAPAIN & FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., COIMBATORE

ITA 464/CHNY/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

O.ARUMUGASAMY,,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT,, COIMBATORE

ITA 771/CHNY/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. SRI M.PALANISAMY, COIMBATORE

ITA 1185/CHNY/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

ACIT, COIMBATORE vs. SRI M.PALANISAMY, COIMBATORE

ITA 1583/CHNY/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

ACIT, COIMBATORE vs. SRI M.PALANISAMY, COIMBATORE

ITA 1582/CHNY/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

M.PALANISAMY,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE

ITA 1044/CHNY/2011[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

ACIT, COIMBATORE vs. SHRI A.SENTHILKUMAR, COIMBATORE

ITA 1450/CHNY/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

ACIT, COIMBATORE vs. SHRI A.SENTHILKUMAR, COIMBATORE

ITA 1449/CHNY/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. SENTHIL PAPAIN & FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., COIMBATORE

ITA 467/CHNY/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. SENTHIL BUILDING MATERIAL MANUFACTURING CO. (P) LTD., COIMBATORE

ITA 1716/CHNY/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. SENTHIL BUILDING MATERIAL MANUFACTURING CO. (P) LTD., COIMBATORE

ITA 1715/CHNY/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

DCIT, COIMBATORE vs. M/S. SENTHIL PAPAIN & FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., COIMBATORE

ITA 462/CHNY/2012[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

ACIT, COIMBATORE vs. SHRI A.SENTHILKUMAR, COIMBATORE

ITA 1451/CHNY/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization

ACIT, COIMBATORE vs. SHRI A.SENTHILKUMAR, COIMBATORE

ITA 1452/CHNY/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Sept 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalassessment

Section 132Section 153A

147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 7.2 Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s. 153A of the Act on 27.04.2007. Period of 21 months u/s. 153B of the Act should be reckoned from the end of the financial year in which the last of 11 44 Appeals of S/Shri M.Palanisamy, A. Senthilkumar, T.M.Muthukumar, O. Arumugasamy & others authorization