K864 MURALI CHENNAMPATTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY,ERODE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 681/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 K864 Murali Chennampatti Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Op Credit Society, Vs. Ward 2(1), Murali, Murali Post, Erode. Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District – 638 504. Pan: Aabak 3671M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, Ca (Through Virtual Mode) ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Pryati Sharma, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03.06.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.06.2025

80P, despite the appellant's compliance with substantive conditions. The appellant relied the following order of the Hon'ble ITAT Chennai bench i. The ACIT Vs M/s. DAEE Coop T&C Society ITA No.: 3047/CHNY/2019 dt. 10.11.2020 6. The CIT(A) Wrongly initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) without proving concealment of income. 3. Brief facts

TAMILNADU SPECIAL POLICE EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-7(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 791/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19 Tamilnadu Special Police The Income Tax Officer, Employees Cooperative, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 7(3), No.81/10, Police Quarters, Chennai. S.M. Nagar, Avadi, Chennai – 600 062. Pan: Aafat 0366E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : None ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gowthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.08.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14.08.2025

Section 80P is to encourage and incentivize the Cooperative movement by providing special deductions under the Income Tax Act. 5. The Ld. Assessing Officer has erred in not allowing the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2) (d) of the Act of Rs. 3,20,14,435/-for the interest received from the Cooperative bank. 6. The Ld. Assessing Officer failed

K.K.CHINNAPUTHUR PACCS,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), TIRUPPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.828 & 829/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 K.K. Chinnaputhur Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Credit Society, 52/37A, Ward 2(4), Reddipalayam, Chinnapudhur Post, Tiruppur. Dharapuram, Tiruppur 638 656. [Pan:Aabak3665K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 29.08.2024 & 18.02.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Years 20015-16 & 2016-17 Respectively.

80P of the Act and added to the total income of the assessee and completed the assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 30.03.2022. On appeal, besides dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee since the assessee did not comply with the hearing notices or filed any documentary evidences in support of grounds of appeal

K.K. CHINNAPUTHUR PACCS,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), TIRUPPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.828 & 829/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 K.K. Chinnaputhur Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Credit Society, 52/37A, Ward 2(4), Reddipalayam, Chinnapudhur Post, Tiruppur. Dharapuram, Tiruppur 638 656. [Pan:Aabak3665K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 29.08.2024 & 18.02.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Years 20015-16 & 2016-17 Respectively.

80P of the Act and added to the total income of the assessee and completed the assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 30.03.2022. On appeal, besides dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee since the assessee did not comply with the hearing notices or filed any documentary evidences in support of grounds of appeal

THE COIMBATORE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, NCW 1(1), COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2593/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 V. The Coimbatore Co-Operative- The Income Tax Officer, Housing Society Ltd., Non-Corporate Ward-1(1), 15, Gopalapuram, 2Nd Street, Coimbatore. Coimbatore – 641 018. [Pan: Aabat 0297 N]

reassessment order dated 20.03.2023 u/s.143/263 of the Act, wherein he disallowed the interest earned by assessee on its money kept with the Axis Bank to the tune of Rs.11,25,431/-. Thus, the AO disallowed the claim made by the assessee u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. On appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) has confirmed the action

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, CUDDALLORE vs. M/S VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPRUAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERTATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE CUDDALORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.,CUDDALORE vs. DCIT CUDDALORE CIRCLE, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-I,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-II,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

ORUVANDUR PACB LTD,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO, WARD 2, NAMAKKAL, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2117/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 Oruvandur Pacb Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Orunvandur Po, Ward-2, Namakkal, Namakkal Tamil Nadu-637015, [Pan: Aaaao0407C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.T.S.Lakshmi Venkataraman, C.A प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Saujanya Ranjan, Irs सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

section 80P of the Act. The Ld. Counsel argued that it is assailing the order of Ld.CIT(A) both on legal grounds as well as on the merits of the case. As the legal ground of the appellant assessee strikes at the very root of the reassessment