TAMILNADU SPECIAL POLICE EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-7(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 791/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19 Tamilnadu Special Police The Income Tax Officer, Employees Cooperative, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 7(3), No.81/10, Police Quarters, Chennai. S.M. Nagar, Avadi, Chennai – 600 062. Pan: Aafat 0366E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : None ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gowthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11.08.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14.08.2025

Section 80P is to encourage and incentivize the Cooperative movement by providing special deductions under the Income Tax Act. 5. The Ld. Assessing Officer has erred in not allowing the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2) (d) of the Act of Rs. 3,20,14,435/-for the interest received from the Cooperative bank. 6. The Ld. Assessing Officer failed

ITO,WARD-2, CUDDALORE vs. NLC INDCOSERVE, NEYVELI

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

section 80P(2)(a)(vi) are not violated by the assessee society and it is eligible for deduction. Aggrieved, the revenue filed this appeal, inter alia, with the following grounds: 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made on the ground that NLC is a member as per bye-laws of the society

ITO WARD 2, CUDDALORE vs. NLC INDCOSERVE, NEYVELI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2539/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2010-2011. Income Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Nlc Indcoserve, Ward 2, Old M.M.C. Complex, Cuddalore, Opp. To Thermal Power Station, Neyveli 607 807. Neyveli 607 801. Cuddalore Division.

section 80P(2)(a)(vi) are not violated by the assessee society and it is eligible for deduction. Aggrieved, the revenue filed this appeal, inter alia, with the following grounds: 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made on the ground that NLC is a member as per bye-laws of the society

ITO, CUDDALORE vs. NLC INDCOSERVE, CUDDALORE

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

section 80P(2)(a)(vi) are not violated by the assessee society and it is eligible for deduction. Aggrieved, the revenue filed this appeal, inter alia, with the following grounds: 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made on the ground that NLC is a member as per bye-laws of the society

K.K. CHINNAPUTHUR PACCS,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), TIRUPPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.828 & 829/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 K.K. Chinnaputhur Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Credit Society, 52/37A, Ward 2(4), Reddipalayam, Chinnapudhur Post, Tiruppur. Dharapuram, Tiruppur 638 656. [Pan:Aabak3665K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 29.08.2024 & 18.02.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Years 20015-16 & 2016-17 Respectively.

80P of the Act and added to the total income of the assessee and completed the assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 30.03.2022. On appeal, besides dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee since the assessee did not comply with the hearing notices or filed any documentary evidences in support of grounds of appeal

K.K.CHINNAPUTHUR PACCS,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), TIRUPPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.828 & 829/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 K.K. Chinnaputhur Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Co-Operative Credit Society, 52/37A, Ward 2(4), Reddipalayam, Chinnapudhur Post, Tiruppur. Dharapuram, Tiruppur 638 656. [Pan:Aabak3665K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 29.08.2024 & 18.02.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Years 20015-16 & 2016-17 Respectively.

80P of the Act and added to the total income of the assessee and completed the assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated 30.03.2022. On appeal, besides dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee since the assessee did not comply with the hearing notices or filed any documentary evidences in support of grounds of appeal

THE COIMBATORE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, NCW 1(1), COIMBATORE

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2593/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 V. The Coimbatore Co-Operative- The Income Tax Officer, Housing Society Ltd., Non-Corporate Ward-1(1), 15, Gopalapuram, 2Nd Street, Coimbatore. Coimbatore – 641 018. [Pan: Aabat 0297 N]

reassessment order dated 20.03.2023 u/s.143/263 of the Act, wherein he disallowed the interest earned by assessee on its money kept with the Axis Bank to the tune of Rs.11,25,431/-. Thus, the AO disallowed the claim made by the assessee u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. On appeal, the Ld.CIT(A) has confirmed the action

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

AMMAPALAYAM BASUVAPTTI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1) ERODE, ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

DCIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-22(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S DAEE COOP T&C SOCIETY, KALPAKKAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 and cross objections filed by the assessee for assessment years 2012-13, 2014-15 &

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 592, 593 & 594/Chny/2023 & Co Nos: 23, 24 & 25/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Dae Employees Coop Thrift Income Tax, V. & Credit Society Ltd, Non Corporate Circle - First Floor, Main Shopping 22(1), Centre, Dae Township, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Kalpakkam – 603 102. West Tambaram, [Pan: Aaaad-4689-H] Chennai – 45. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Cross Objector) : Shri. Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By Respondent/Cross Objector By : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

reassessment proceedings, the assessee cannot claim any new benefits or fresh claims, because the reopening of assessment is in the benefits of the revenue. Therefore, he submitted that the CIT(A) erred in allowing relief to the assessee and their order should be reversed. 8. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, on the other hand submits that the assessee

K 0716 RAKKIAPALAYAM PACC,TIRUPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4) TIRUPUR, TIRUPUR

Bench: Hon'Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon'Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1820/Chny/2025

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The assessment has been completed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act on 09.12.2019 where, the Assessing Officer has disallowed deduction claimed u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, on the ground that the assessee did not satisfied the conditions of filing return of income on or before due date prescribed u/s.139

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, CUDDALLORE vs. M/S VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPRUAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE CUDDALORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.,CUDDALORE vs. DCIT CUDDALORE CIRCLE, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-I,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-II,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERTATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

80P was withdrawn for Co-operative Banks. Since the claim deduction of Rs.3,47,01,173 towards of release of reserves and standard assets related to exempted periods, the same is not allowable deduction and has to be withdrawn. II) Further it was noticed that the assessee had claimed deductions of Rs.14,95,14,257/- under Section 36(1) (viia