BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “reassessment”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore52Delhi39Mumbai28Patna10Chennai9Kolkata8Chandigarh7Hyderabad7Visakhapatnam4Jaipur4Raipur4Lucknow3Indore2Pune2Karnataka2Ahmedabad1Surat1Telangana1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 13212Section 2509Section 153A5Section 1484Section 40A(3)2Section 260A2Section 153C2Addition to Income2

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

ITA 1254/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr. N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. C. Yamuna, CIT &
Section 132Section 153CSection 250

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

ITA 1238/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr. N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. C. Yamuna, CIT &
Section 132Section 153CSection 250

Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act fro analyzed the entire statutory framework of Section 153C of the Act from its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance Act, 2017 and its its introduction to the amendment by Finance

ASSISSTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. ESTRA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

ITA 1653/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 May 2025AY 2014-15
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 45(2)Section 53A

53A of the transfer of property act\n882: or Transfer of Immovable property under agreement to sell.\nTransfer deemed to be take place on the date on which possession a\nimmovable property is given in pursuance of agreement to sell,\nHence capital gains arise in the year in which possession in given\nbuyer, not the date on which property

A GOVINDARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MADURAI, CENTRAL RANGE, MADURAI vs. INDIAN OCEAN GARNET SANDS COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 199/CHNY/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.199 To 203/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2017-18 V. The Dcit, M/S. Indian Ocean Garnet Central Circle-2, Sands Co. Pvt. Ltd., Madurai. No.146, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin-628 003. [Pan: Aaaci 4083 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. P. Ranga Ramanujam, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh-
Section 132Section 250

reassess taking into consideration the other r r material material material in in in respect respect respect of of of completed completed completed assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence

A GOVINDARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MADURAI, CENTRAL RANGE, MADURAI vs. INDIAN OCEAN GARNET SANDS COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 200/CHNY/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.199 To 203/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2017-18 V. The Dcit, M/S. Indian Ocean Garnet Central Circle-2, Sands Co. Pvt. Ltd., Madurai. No.146, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin-628 003. [Pan: Aaaci 4083 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. P. Ranga Ramanujam, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh-
Section 132Section 250

reassess taking into consideration the other r r material material material in in in respect respect respect of of of completed completed completed assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence

A GOVINDARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MADURAI, CENTRAL RANGE, MADURAI vs. INDIAN OCEAN GARNET SANDS COMPANY PVT LTD, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 201/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.199 To 203/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2017-18 V. The Dcit, M/S. Indian Ocean Garnet Central Circle-2, Sands Co. Pvt. Ltd., Madurai. No.146, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin-628 003. [Pan: Aaaci 4083 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. P. Ranga Ramanujam, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh-
Section 132Section 250

reassess taking into consideration the other r r material material material in in in respect respect respect of of of completed completed completed assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence

A GOVINDARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MADURAI, CENTRAL RANGE, MADURAI vs. INDIAN OCEAN GARNET SANDS COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 202/CHNY/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.199 To 203/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2017-18 V. The Dcit, M/S. Indian Ocean Garnet Central Circle-2, Sands Co. Pvt. Ltd., Madurai. No.146, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin-628 003. [Pan: Aaaci 4083 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. P. Ranga Ramanujam, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh-
Section 132Section 250

reassess taking into consideration the other r r material material material in in in respect respect respect of of of completed completed completed assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence

A GOVINDARAJ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MADURAI, CENTRAL RANGE, MADURAI vs. INDIAN OCEAN GARNET SANDS COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 203/CHNY/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.199 To 203/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2017-18 V. The Dcit, M/S. Indian Ocean Garnet Central Circle-2, Sands Co. Pvt. Ltd., Madurai. No.146, Palayamkottai Road, Tuticorin-628 003. [Pan: Aaaci 4083 Q] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. P. Ranga Ramanujam, CAFor Respondent: Mr. R. Clement Ramesh-
Section 132Section 250

reassess taking into consideration the other r r material material material in in in respect respect respect of of of completed completed completed assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1765/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Jan 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 1765/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2008-09) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs Mr. Arvind Srinivasan Income Tax, Central Circle-3(4), 61, Oliver Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 004. Pan: Adcpa0371R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) ""यथ"/Respondent/

For Appellant: Mr. B.S.Purushotham, CAFor Respondent: 02.12.2020
Section 1Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 260ASection 40A(3)

53A of the IT Act, the AO is entrusted with the duty of bringing to tax, the total income of the assessee whose case is covered by Sec. I53A of the IT Act for each assessment year falling within the six assessment years immediately preceding the previous year in which search was conducted and that even if an assessment order