BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

17 results for “reassessment”+ Section 32(1)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai52Delhi32Raipur31Jaipur25Chennai17Ahmedabad15Bangalore13Indore10Kolkata8Cuttack6Cochin5Guwahati5Pune4Visakhapatnam3Surat3Lucknow2Chandigarh2Rajkot1Hyderabad1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)45Section 14831Reopening of Assessment16Section 1477Section 115J3Section 143(3)2Section 14A2Section 143(2)2Disallowance2Addition to Income

ACIT, LTU-2,, CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2618/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

iia) of the Act on the same. The Ld. CIT, DR appearing before us are was unable to controvert the same. We therefore do not see any reason to interfere with the order of Ld. CIT(A) in this regard and accordingly dismiss this ground of the Revenue.” 5.2 The Ld. CIT, DR was not able to distinguish the above

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

2

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1616/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1612/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2013/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1615/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1611/CHNY/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2012/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1619/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2106/CHNY/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1613/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1617/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2014/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2015/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1618/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1614/CHNY/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI & SONS LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2252/CHNY/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

M/S. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-8(1), LTU-II,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 601/CHNY/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jul 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 32(1)(iia)

32(1)(iia) of the Act. Thereafter, the AO issued notice u/s.148 of the Act dated 31.03.2017 after expiry of four (4) years, reopening the assessment, for the reasons that additional depreciation could not be allowed to the assessee on account of electrical installations, data processing equipment & exchange fluctuation loss. Thereafter, the reassessment was completed u/s 147/143