SHALINI SANJEEVI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed
ITA 768/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Jun 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.768 & 769/Chny/2025 िनधा=रण वष= /Assessment Years: 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(b)Section 273B
reassessment proceeding u/s
147 of the Act. Accordingly an order u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act
was passed on 13.12.2023 by making addition of Rs. Rs.1,00,65,900/-
on account of unexplained investment. During the assessment
proceeding notices u/s 142(1) of the Act were issued three times upon
the assessee which were not complied. Therefore, AO imposed