ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. M/S CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT & FINANCE COMPANY LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Ble

239 CTR 82 (Cal) Assessment made after making detailed enquiries – Reassessment • cannot be made Wherein it was held that assessing officer had allowed a deduction after making inquiries and considering the reply of the assessee, then the subsequent withdrawal of the same under Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Ble

239 CTR 82 (Cal) Assessment made after making detailed enquiries – Reassessment • cannot be made Wherein it was held that assessing officer had allowed a deduction after making inquiries and considering the reply of the assessee, then the subsequent withdrawal of the same under Section

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FIANANCE CO. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

239 CTR 82 (Cal)\n•\nAssessment made after making detailed enquiries – Reassessment\ncannot be made\nWherein it was held that assessing officer had allowed a deduction\nafter making inquiries and considering the reply of the assessee,\nthen the subsequent withdrawal of the same under Section

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (DCIT), CHENNAI-1, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

239 CTR 82 (Cal)\n•\nAssessment made after making detailed enquiries – Reassessment\ncannot be made\nWherein it was held that assessing officer had allowed a deduction\nafter making inquiries and considering the reply of the assessee,\nthen the subsequent withdrawal of the same under Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. M/S CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

239 CTR 82 (Cal)\n•\nAssessment made after making detailed enquiries – Reassessment\ncannot be made\nWherein it was held that assessing officer had allowed a deduction\nafter making inquiries and considering the reply of the assessee,\nthen the subsequent withdrawal of the same under Section

A-ONE LEATHERS,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 4(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 4148/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. A-One Leathers, The Assistant Commissioner No.15/8, Vepery High Road, Vs. Of Income Tax, Periamet, Non-Corporate Circle 4(1), Chennai – 600 003. Chennai. Pan: Aaafa 4576H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri S. Anandh, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Aroon Praasad, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.02.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.03.2026 आदेश/ O R D E R Per George George K: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Dated 14.10.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’). The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2015-16. 2. The Grounds Raised Read As Follows:- :- 2 -:

239/- is an ex-parte order since the assessee firm did not respond to the notices issued u/s.142(1) of the Act. The reason stated for ex-parte order before the AO during the course of reassessment proceedings is that assessee’s business had suffered losses. It is stated that all the staff including the accountant had left the assessee

DCIT CC-2(1), CHENNAI vs. M/S GREEN STAR FERTILIZERS LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 868/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Green Star Fertilizers Income-Tax, V. Limited, No. 88, Spic House, 7Th Floor, Corporate Circle-2(1), Chennai. Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aadcg-9451-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. D. Hem Bhupal, Jcit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. B. Ramakrishnan, Fca सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 29.11.2022 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023

section as per the I. T Act allows the assessee to capitalised the notional forex loss and to claim depreciation. 4.3 In view of the above, the depreciation claimed on account capitalised unrealised loss of Rs.8,56,57,500/- on reinstatement of ECB loan is disallowed to the tune of Rs.1,28,48,625- (i.e. Rs.8,56,57,500x16

RAYMIX CONCRETE INDIA PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORP. CIRCLE-5(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

section 147, no reassessment could be initiated after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year unless there was a failure on the part of the assessee to make a full and true disclosure of all material facts. The ld.AR further submitted that the AO had completed the original assessment after examining all relevant records

M/S. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

239 and CIT Vs T V Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Pvt Ltd [1999] 238 ITR 328 to reject the legal plea raised by the assessee. Though having acknowledged the fact, in this letter dated 14.03.2022 M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd. :: 5 :: that, ALWL was no longer in existence as it stood merged with ALL with effect 01.04.2018, the AO is noted

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. HELP LINE MOTOR FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

239 to support the contention that the income of some other person cannot be added in the hands of one person has held in the case of M/s. Cholan Auto Finance that when all the 77 firms carried on business under their respective PAN, assessing the entire income earned by the group of the firms, in the hands

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. NO 1 AUTO FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

239 to support the contention that the income of some other person cannot be added in the hands of one person has held in the case of M/s. Cholan Auto Finance that when all the 77 firms carried on business under their respective PAN, assessing the entire income earned by the group of the firms, in the hands

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. HELP LINE MOTOR FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

239 to support the contention that the income of some other person cannot be added in the hands of one person has held in the case of M/s. Cholan Auto Finance that when all the 77 firms carried on business under their respective PAN, assessing the entire income earned by the group of the firms, in the hands

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. NO 1 AUTO FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

239 to support the contention that the income of some other person cannot be added in the hands of one person has held in the case of M/s. Cholan Auto Finance that when all the 77 firms carried on business under their respective PAN, assessing the entire income earned by the group of the firms, in the hands