FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

FAMILY HEALTH PLAN (TPA) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO TDS WARD 1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for assessment years

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

194J of the Act. The Circular, inter-alia, provided relief to the deductors (TPA) who could substantiate that the relevant taxes had been paid by the deductee assessee (Hospitals etc.) and for this purpose an auditor's certificate that the tax and interest due from the deductee assessee has been paid for the relevant assessment year would be sufficient compliance

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

DCIT LTU 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assesse and Revenue are dealt as under:-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92 & 93 /Chny/2018 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, M/S.Royal Sundaram General Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Insurance Company Limited, Large Tax Payer Unit, Vishranthi Melaram Towers, Chennai. No.2/319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai(Omr), Karapakkam, Chennai-600 097. [Pan: Aabcr7106G] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.491, 492, 493, 494, 495 & 496 /Chny/2018 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S.Royal Sundaram General Large Tax Payer Unit, Insurance Company Limited, Chennai. Vishranthi Melaram Towers, No.2/319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai(Omr), Karapakkam, Chennai-600 097. [Pan: Aabcr7106G] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri Vikaram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.Sanjay For Ms V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing Counsel For It Dept. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15.10.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.01.2025

194J and such failure attracts the consequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act. The payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person of the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

DCIT LTU 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

DCIT LTU 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

DCIT LTU 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

DCIT LTU 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assesse and Revenue are dealt as under:-

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92 & 93 /Chny/2018 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, M/S.Royal Sundaram General Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Insurance Company Limited, Large Tax Payer Unit, Vishranthi Melaram Towers, Chennai. No.2/319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai(Omr), Karapakkam, Chennai-600 097. [Pan: Aabcr7106G] आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.491, 492, 493, 494, 495 & 496 /Chny/2018 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S.Royal Sundaram General Large Tax Payer Unit, Insurance Company Limited, Chennai. Vishranthi Melaram Towers, No.2/319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai(Omr), Karapakkam, Chennai-600 097. [Pan: Aabcr7106G] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri Vikaram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.Sanjay For Ms V.Pushpa, Sr.Standing Counsel For It Dept. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15.10.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.01.2025

194J and such failure attracts the consequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act. The payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person of the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU, CHENNAI

194J and such failure attracts the\nconsequential non-deductibility of the amounts as per section 40(a)(ia) of the IT\nAct.\nThe payments mentioned supra have been made by the assessee M/s Royal\nSundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited to various Hospital/Insured person\nof the time of credit of the said sum and payment failed to deduct tax at source