BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

37 results for “reassessment”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai67Delhi49Chennai37Raipur21Indore21Chandigarh20Jaipur20Ahmedabad18Kolkata17Bangalore14Cochin10Pune9Visakhapatnam8Dehradun7Jodhpur6Cuttack5Allahabad5Hyderabad3Surat2Patna2Ranchi1SC1Nagpur1Gauhati1Jabalpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)45Section 14844Section 14A22Reopening of Assessment22Section 194C19Section 14718Addition to Income18TDS16Deduction15Section 40

GOPINATHAN,CUMBUM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THENI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 25/CHNY/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 25/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Shri Gopinathan, The Income Tax Officer, No. 37/4, L.F. Road, Opp. To Vs. Ward 1, Government Hospital, Cumbum, Theni. Theni District 625 516. [Pan:Ardpg2494G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Gopalan (Irs) Ret. Jcit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 19.07.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.08.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), New Delhi, Dated 12.11.2021 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. Besides Challenging Confirmation Of Addition Of ₹. 4,66,455/- On Account Of Alleged Infringement Of Section 194C Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short], The Assessee Has Also Challenged The Rectification Order Passed Under Section 154 Of The Act On The Pretext

For Appellant: Shri G. Gopalan (IRS) Ret. JCITFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147

Showing 1–20 of 37 · Page 1 of 2

14
Section 143(3)12
Disallowance12
Section 148
Section 154
Section 194C
Section 194C(6)
Section 194C(7)
Section 40

reassessment proceedings, after verification of books of accounts, bank account copies and sales tax return and considering the volume of transaction and the nature of trade, the Assessing Officer disallowed 15% of the expenses claimed since the assessee could not produce vouchers for the expenses by satisfying that the section 194C

ACIT, TIRUNELVELI vs. NEW SANTHA STORES, PALAYAMKOTTAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1161/CHNY/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1161/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 The Asst. Commissioner Of M/S. New Santha Stores, Income Tax, V. Cement Stockists, No.9, Circle – 1, Market Building, Tiruchendur Road, Tirunelveli Palayankottai, Tirunelveli – 627 002. Pan: Aacfn4870D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & Co No.: 74/Chny/2017 (In Ita No.1161/Chny/2017) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. New Santha Stores, The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, V. Cement Stockists, No.9, Circle – 1, Market Building, Tiruchendur Tirunelveli Road, Palayankottai, Tirunelveli – 627 002. Pan: Aacfn4870D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) राज" की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri G. Chandrababu, Addl.Cit "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 17.02.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.03.2021

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Chandrababu, Addl.CIT
Section 194CSection 194ISection 40Section 40a

section 194C of the Act, was become final and the same cannot be considered in the reassessment proceedings is incorrect

DCIT , TDS CIRCLE , COIMBATORE vs. M/S KOVAI MEDICAL CENTRE AND HOSPITAL LIMITED , COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1004/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1004/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Kovai Medical Centre & Income Tax, V. Hospital Limited, Tds Circle, 99 Avinashi Road, Coimbatore. Coimbatore - 641 014. [Pan: Aaack-9192-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. M. Rajan, Cit -Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri. M. Rajan, CIT -DRFor Respondent: Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate
Section 133ASection 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

194C is applicable. The ld. CIT(A), after considering relevant facts has rightly deleted additions made by the AO and their order should be upheld. :-17-: ITA. No:1004/Chny/2022 13. We have heard both the parties, perused materials available on record and gone through orders of the authorities below. The sole basis for the Assessing Officer to compute short deduction

SHRIRAM CAPITAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 513/CHNY/2015[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Jun 2015AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos.512 &513 /Mds/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-2011 & 2011- 2012)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. N. Rengaraj, IRS, CIT
Section 14A

reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing the refund of the assessee under section 154.” 10. It has been made clear by the Hon’ble High Court that sub -section (2) does not ifso facto empower the AO to apply the method prescribed by Rules straightaway without considering whether the claim made

SHRIRAM CAPITAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 512/CHNY/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Jun 2015AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos.512 &513 /Mds/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-2011 & 2011- 2012)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. N. Rengaraj, IRS, CIT
Section 14A

reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing the refund of the assessee under section 154.” 10. It has been made clear by the Hon’ble High Court that sub -section (2) does not ifso facto empower the AO to apply the method prescribed by Rules straightaway without considering whether the claim made

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SALEM vs. GOVINDA RAJULU SRINIVASAN, SALEM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1245/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.Bhupendran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs.C. Yamuna, CIT
Section 147Section 148Section 40Section 40A(3)

194C) TDS Statement – 131249 Interest other than interest on securities (Section 194A) TDS Statement - 50780 Insurance commission (Section 194D) The assessee had filed his return of income on 30.11.2014 admitting total income of Rs. 35,66,120/-for the A.Y. 2014-15. It is noticed from the Department Software (Insight-High Risk CRIU/ VRU Information) that the assessee had sold

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1619/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1616/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1612/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2013/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1615/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1611/CHNY/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2012/CHNY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2106/CHNY/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1613/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1617/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2014/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. KASTURI AND SONS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2015/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1618/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment

KASTURI AND SONS LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1614/CHNY/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Sh. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. Jeyakumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment was made within a period of four years on the basis of the material brought to the notice of the Assessing Officer during the scrutiny assessment proceeding for the assessment year 2008-09. As in the earlier years, i.e. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Board resolution and relationship of management trainees were not available during the original assessment